his argument is ridiculous.
He puts up the case of fruit farmers and assumes that they will have to hire British fruit pickers at higher wages therefore boost the economy.
Firstly, if wages of seasonal fruit pickers does go up, it affects only a tiny number and seasonal workers at that. Next, farmers will just apply for short term work visas for those whom they want to hire from abroad.
If t's the best he can do then it's insignificant in GDP term.
Countries form trading blocs to reduce the cost of doing business. On automotives, the net margin is less than 6% but the sums are very high so its effect on GDP is substantial. If the cost of doing business adds another 1%, that may be enough for the business to disinvest in the UK.
That will hurt our GDP.
At the scale of the country GDP, big businesses are the key in the long term. The jury is still out but I reckon brexit will hurt GDP.
Its not ridiculous at all. If fruit pickers have to rely on foreign slave labour to survive, something is wrong.
Always amazes me that all these so called socialists, crying out for good wages, good conditions etc etc, for all (perfectly reasonable) then want to keep a situation where only reason folk are employed is for low wages, poor working conditions and practices that encourage Gig economy.
You want us to be able to pay crap wages to poor Romanians so that we can have cheap fruit?? If I was running a business that could not afford to pay decent pay with fair conditions and some semblance of security for its workers I, d expect it to fail. You want it to succeed on exploitation of whoever is desperate enough to take the poor wages. It should be stopped and will be out the EU. Rightly so.
Farmers struggle getting locals to work for them because they demand better pay and conditions, in mean time your farmers just get richer. I, ve never met a poor one yet. Farmers pay fair wages.? No chance, until they must. That doesn't sound like socialism to me.And EU openly promote this exploitation.???
Margaret Thatcher would be proud of EU stance. In 80s,given chance, she'd have filled mines with cheap East European labour. The Unions had fought for years to get good pay in pits,should they also be manned by cheapest possible workforce so owners can be more profitable, not worry about HS etc etc. You are arguing for a Tory practice.