I’m pleased that we finally agree on something. This is a rare event because you are actually correct. Well done you.Of course you are ...
Now excuse me, I need to deal with my enthalpy.
I’m pleased that we finally agree on something. This is a rare event because you are actually correct. Well done you.Of course you are ...
I have been wondering how much of the documentation will not make it into the National Archives for future generations to assess. Whether by avoidance of writing things down in the first place or somehow disappearing.The Times and Sunday Times are claiming that the EU have tabled
some last minute demands , the EU say hey there is nothing new on the table .
The question is is who can you believe to be telling the truth
It's a bit of a tragedy that no one can say our side won't be lying through their teeth
There are lies damned lies and conservative statementsI have been wondering how much of the documentation will not make it into the National Archives for future generations to assess. Whether by avoidance of writing things down in the first place or somehow disappearing.
I suspect that there will be a contrast between what the UK politicians have said/admitted in public and reality. Whether the best commentators are any more accurate remains to be seen.
Con statements, I suggest. In both French and English meanings.There are lies damned lies and conservative statements
I doubt we will ever know the truth. The best policy is to trust no one in these circumstancesThe Times and Sunday Times are claiming that the EU have tabled
some last minute demands , the EU say hey there is nothing new on the table .
The question is is who can you believe to be telling the truth
It's a bit of a tragedy that no one can say our side won't be lying through their teeth
I don't see why any of the in process documents should ever be archived. The only thing which matters in the final version and the final briefing notesI have been wondering how much of the documentation will not make it into the National Archives for future generations to assess. Whether by avoidance of writing things down in the first place or somehow disappearing.
I suspect that there will be a contrast between what the UK politicians have said/admitted in public and reality. Whether the best commentators are any more accurate remains to be seen.
Historians love background information which can help to interpret the public documents. And many of us have been fascinated by some of the things that have been revealed by sometimes unexpected documents.I don't see why any of the in process documents should ever be archived. The only thing which matters in the final version and the final briefing notes
I see a difference between a position paper presented to a cabinet ,and a proposal introduced for horse trading purposes.Historians love background information which can help to interpret the public documents. And many of us have been fascinated by some of the things that have been revealed by sometimes unexpected documents.
I'd not want any of this lot to get away with hiding their actions even if it takes several decades to be published.
I wouldn’t get too carried away. Ireland is being played like tinker’s penny whistle by the EU. Unlike France, Germany and formally the U.K., Ireland is suckling on the EU’s teat. They are a nett cost and once they have served their purpose, will be relegated to parasitic status by their masters.I see a difference between a position paper presented to a cabinet ,and a proposal introduced for horse trading purposes.
What I expect to find in the fullness of time is that the new "demands" from the EU are legal clarifications of pre existing positions. The reason for these clarifications is because the UK has lost the trust of the EU . In terms of an own goal the insistence by BJ to go against the advice of the HoLs and "even in a limited way" to break an existing treaty takes some beating. Especially when at the exact same time you are trying to negotiate an even bigger treaty.
There were very interesting asides yesterday from our Simon Coveney , the Foreign Affairs Minister regarding fisheries.
His view is very much contrary to the UK position.
1. This is about coastal communities in Ireland and France ,not about money. Money or compensation will not fix it.
2. The UK or the BJ Cabinet see this as a acid public test of sovereignty, and would give money
Of significance is that Coveney constituency is very much a coastal region.
That's a typically English view of the EU, and wrong because it completely misunderstands what the EU is about and why it was formed.I wouldn’t get too carried away. Ireland is being played like tinker’s penny whistle by the EU. Unlike France, Germany and formally the U.K., Ireland is suckling on the EU’s teat. They are a nett cost and once they have served their purpose, will be relegated to parasitic status by their masters.
We will see...I wouldn’t get too carried away. Ireland is being played like tinker’s penny whistle by the EU. Unlike France, Germany and formally the U.K., Ireland is suckling on the EU’s teat. They are a nett cost and once they have served their purpose, will be relegated to parasitic status by their masters.
Granny bitty - YouTubeI was bought up on the teat.
Not so bad as the pair can sit down over a chummy pint and a slap up scotch egg or a kipper or whatever food prop is flavour of the day...Feel sorry for Von der Leyen...
Brexit: Johnson and Von der Leyen to take over with direct talks
UK PM and European commission president to speak on Saturday after negotiators fail to reach agreement