Bojo will.But who accepts the extension on behalf of the UK?.
Failing that, Bercow will.
It's not likely that lorries coming to Dublin from the North are going to be stopped next Thursday.
Bojo will.But who accepts the extension on behalf of the UK?.
Still nothing of value to add to the debate? please make an attempt not to make pointless posts like these, they make you look stupid.Yes it does but only to you and more an more often.
You are ranting about fascism above I see.
Its like when you go to the zoo and watch in grim fascination at monkeys flinging poo at each other
You should look back at my posts. I've never spoken of whether we accept an offered extension or not, only that the EU would decide whether it accepted Johnson's request or not. The Scottish court is entirely irrelevant to that since they have no jurisdiction whatsoever over the EU. The EU didn't even need a request, they could have offered an extension at any time whether asked or not.I am still on this because it still has relevance. The EU has said they are in principle prepared to offer an extension. But who accepts the extension on behalf of the UK?. Post #65513 is relevant.
The UK EU ambassador signs under the instruction of the PM.. presumably. It is an executive function not a legislative one.
Still nothing of value to add to the debate? please make an attempt not to make pointless posts like these, they make you look stupid.
Thanks Zlatan. The principle appears good but I wonder at the robustness of tubes in the combustion chamber directing micro jets of fuel to combustion points.Completely OT but thought flecc might be interested. Thought they had given up on this.Say they have got it working reducing soot and indirectly NOx.??!!Diesel innovation has humble beginnings
An engine innovation first conceived and tested by Sandia National Laboratories has attracted the attention of big business because of its potential to cost-effectively reduce emissions of soot and nitrogen oxides, encourage the use of renewable fuels, and maintain or improve engine performance.m.techxplore.com
Ok. The EU are nothing if not polite. They would not a acceeded to a request or offered an extension without being asked. It would logically be seen as bullying. They would of course had anticipated this and had their position organised.You should look back at my posts. I've never spoken of whether we accept an offered extension or not, only that the EU would decide whether it accepted Johnson's request or not. The Scottish court is entirely irrelevant to that since they have no jurisdiction whatsoever over the EU. The EU didn't even need a request, they could have offered an extension at any time whether asked or not.
As Woosh and I have posted, there are others who can accept the extension, Johnson cannot block it now he's requested it and the court cannot on the shaky grounds that they were judging.
.
Sorry Danidl, but you're really tying yourself into knots.What would be the response of a court to a challenge by BJ to the usurpation of his PM function.
oF course I am being speculative, What precedents are there for the Speaker usurping the PM?. If he were to challenge it, how long would that take?. Who is going to sign on new extension? And When?. Then who is going to move the vote in the HoC on accepting the extension.? A lot of moving parts ,very little time , a couple of fluffed deadlines and then crashout. The EU Parliament has not yet approved the deal either so , even were HoC to capitulate, it could run out of time. Then your Mr Cash and others will have achieved their goal.Sorry Danidl, but you're really tying yourself into knots.
BJ could not issue a legal challenge based on usurping his PM function for the simple reason that the request for an extension was parliament's legal requirement of him. Such a challenge would be thrown out instantly since Johnson would be arguing from a position of his illegality.
Parliament required him in law to request the extension on behalf of the UK and he complied, even confirming in advance when asked that he would comply with that law.
Since that was a legal requirement of parliament on behalf of the UK, if Johnson had refused, apart from any action taken against him, the request would default to either Parliament's Speaker or a court to send it. That is our UK legal position.
This from the 21st inst. is relevant, showing that my position was correct, that the request Johnson sent was valid, regardless of any Scottish court consideration of whether it was or not:
"UK Government lawyers told a hearing on the Benn Act earlier his month that Johnson "cannot frustrate its purpose or the purpose of its provisions" and said there was "no question but that he will comply with the requirements of the law".
Cherry said: "Despite his childish trick of not signing the letter and sending a contradictory covering letter, the EU, who are the grown-ups in the room, have accepted the request and are considering it."
.
The haven't agreed to what if anything it should be yet, have they?oF course I am being speculative, What precedents are there for the Speaker usurping the PM?. If he were to challenge it, how long would that take?. Who is going to sign on new extension? And When?. Then who is going to move the vote in the HoC on accepting the extension.? A lot of moving parts ,very little time , a couple of fluffed deadlines and then crashout. Then your Mr Cash and others will have achieved their goal.
I am looking towards next week , you are reviewing history. Had the EU been bloody minded, they could easily have ignored the surly request.
Frustrate their knavish tricks.Despite his childish trick of not signing the letter and sending a contradictory covering letter
I wasn't being speculative of course, I merely stated what I was sure was the legal position of the request made, and that the EU would definitely accept it. Thus it proved to be.oF course I am being speculative, What precedents are there for the Speaker usurping the PM?. If he were to challenge it, how long would that take?. Who is going to sign on new extension? And When?. Then who is going to move the vote in the HoC on accepting the extension.? A lot of moving parts ,very little time , a couple of fluffed deadlines and then crashout. The EU Parliament has not yet approved the deal either so , even were HoC to capitulate, it could run out of time. Then your Mr Cash and others will have achieved their goal.
I am looking towards next week , you are reviewing history. Had the EU been bloody minded, they could easily have ignored the surly request.
The newspapers really are nuts. Given the likely temperatures in December, how could unheated garages without toilet facilities become polling stations from 7am to 10 pm? Householders would graphically tell the authorities what to do with such a suggestion.The Telegraph's version of Project Fear:
Homeowners could have to convert garages and conservatories into polling stations to ensure a Christmas election can go ahead
of course.The newspapers really are nuts. Given the likely temperatures in December, how could unheated garages without toilet facilities become polling stations from 7am to 10 pm? Householders would graphically tell the authorities what to do with such a suggestion.
No doubt the schools and other facilities normally used would be in use as usual for the one day.
.