As I suspected, from your comments the modern air units seem to have conquered the noise issue, back then it was a big problem!
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
Which bit of my post was against it?
And don't give me the bit about the advisory only referendum being binding, and let me remind you about the fact that whatever previous parliaments decided.
Does not bind current or future ones.
Got that?
There is nothing undemocratic in my suggestion, in fact it is the only democratic way forward to ask when a deal is agreed with the EU to ask for confirmation .
Are you afraid of losing your booby prize win or something?
They didn't want to create a "Moral principle" that a Tory Government actually gives a Tinkers Cuss about businesses.
But they do care about business. If it pays them enough.
And they are not too particular about the currency or it's origin it seems.
Which bit of my post was against it?
And don't give me the bit about the advisory only referendum being binding, and let me remind you about the fact that whatever previous parliaments decided.
Does not bind current or future ones.
Got that?
There is nothing undemocratic in my suggestion, in fact it is the only democratic way forward to ask when a deal is agreed with the EU to ask for confirmation .
Are you afraid of losing your booby prize win or something?
Wow
It was a simple question.
Why can't you answer it?
Yes.
The original question upon which we voted has changed, that’s why it is fair and democratic to ask for people’s opinion on the new and revised question. If people are still happy with the new proposal, they will vote for it. You should not fear this.
I fear nothing bar nothing warm farts.
The question hasn't changed at all. The losers just will not accept the result.
You can't have democracy without the permission of the losers. This is why we are where we are.
I did but you were too thick to understand the answer is
YES
Is that a simple enough answer for you?
And that's not the only improvement. My car one is remarkably efficient even when the temperature is nearing zero degrees C outside, while still being quiet enough to be unobtrusive.
.
The losers as you put it know the result was due to a swindle, remember the judgement
"The only reason it was not declared null and void is because it was advisory only.
Had it been mandatory it would have been annulled."
Am I to understand that under those circumstances there were both winners and losers, and not that everyone was cheated?
Why should you expect in that instance anyone to accept the result?
That is why you don't have permission of the losers
Nor should you expect it.
In Parliamentary democracy, yes.
In direct democracy of the people in our complex modern world, emphatically no.
Our Brexit experience to date illustrates only too well the validity of this view.
.
No one should give permission to accept an illegally procured result.
So why are you trying stop democracy working then?
And lose the tude. It's Sunday and no one needs it.
It was illegal?
This is big news. Can you give me the info and I will pass it on to some very keen broadcasters. You may have just stumble upon the news scoop of the decade!
Unless you are lying?
Not again silly boy
The EU referendum was won based on a corrupt campaign, but the courts can't void the result because the referendum only advisory, according to the barrister who took the government to court.
Based on Electoral Commission findings about overspending by Vote Leage, British people living in Europe launched a legal case arguing the referendum result should in effect be set aside. Last week, Court of Appeal judges denied them permission to appeal after losing the case.
Find something else to post to be annoying, you lost this one long ago
Last edited: