Speaking of JRM (as we rather unfortunately seem destined to do):
Jacob Rees-Mogg, the leader of the Commons, is speaking for the government.
He says people voted to leave the EU. MPs must respect that decision.
He says today’s procedure is constitutionally irregular.
(He is referring to the fact that John Bercow, the Speaker, is allowing an SO24 emergency debate to pass a motion giving MPs control of the order paper tomorrow. In the past they have always been used for neutral motions with no practical effect. Earlier this year Bercow indicated that he was willing to allow the procedure to be used to creatively than it was in the past.)
He says this motion risks subverting parliament’s role in scrutinising the executive.
He has a very different way of viewing things to me. Isn't proroguing and attempting to batter their own party members into submission more of a threat to parliament's ability to scrutinise the executive? I ask you, if HoC ain't sitting and the members will get the sack for piping up, what sort of meaningful scrutiny can be expected?
The referendum did not bind the Government and specifically stated that fact
Johnson is simply following the prompting of Cummings in the course of action he is taking and watching the HOC tonight is making a bigger hash than usual
We now have Kings College forecasting an 8% fall in GDP over the next 35 years! in the case of a no deal Brexit..
If it wasn't tragic it would be slapstick comedy.
We need Brexit putting down and a return to reality.
Farage just said if Boris goes for a No deal his party will support him in an election, but if Boris tries for a deal he will fight him all the way.
They are simply saboteurs working against the best interests of the people while pretending to represent them