"It must not be on the basis of a false prospectus"
"If the public have the sense that this was rigged the result will not be legitimate"
Well if we ever have a vote to rejoin I'm sure you will argue for a 2 thirds majority.............Lolfor a referendum to have a mandate normally requires a 2:1 majority for fundamental decisions.
blame Labour party members who voted for a brexiter leader who thought he could do brexit better than the conservatives.Including the percentage of votes illegally induced of course, and that is far too small a margin, for a referendum to have a mandate normally requires a 2:1 majority for fundamental decisions.
It was at best a marginal illegally flawed decision.
Really?
And this is the reality about UK enthusiasm for Brexit
- Malta — 2003 Maltese European Union membership referendum, 8 March 2003, 53.6% in favour, turnout 90.9%
- Slovenia — 2003 Slovenian European Union and NATO membership referendum, 23 March 2003, 89.6% in favour, turnout 60.2%
An entirely manufactured situation, with no deep roots at all, a huge confidence trick.
Are you sure it doesn't depend on reverse osmosis and groundwater? Is there actually a pipeline from Italy?Malta is a tiny country. It literally depends on Italy pumping in fresh water everyday to survive.
Are you sure it doesn't depend on reverse osmosis and groundwater? Is there actually a pipeline from Italy?
You know nothing do you?Malta is a tiny country. It literally depends on Italy pumping in fresh water everyday to survive. Yet it still didn't get your magic 2:1 vote. Hardly something that says make Europe one country?
Slovenia had the option of being reliant on a failed Soviet Union/sattelite of Moscow or the West. Its a no brainer. I'm surprised it wasn't higher tbh.
You are reaching peak rage state again. I will be putting you on ignore very soon if you don't calm down.
Where? Any proper reference to it?yes there is
Are you sure you aren't confusing yourself with the proposed Gas pipeline?yes there is
paid for by the Energy and Water agency that is what has confused him.Where? Any proper reference to it?
Malta is or was considering a gas pipeline connected to Europe.
Where? Any proper reference to it?
Malta is or was considering a gas pipeline connected to Europe.
Whethere the story is genuine or not, the UK is guilty. Under the basic rules of the community from the outset of our entering the EEC, the law forbade any VAT liable item from being exempted.Did I miss it? Or has this not yet been posted?
EU MUST BE JOKING! Sneaky EU chiefs are planning to hit Britain with a tax bill for £1trillion for unpaid VAT
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/9649719/eu-britain-tax-bill-1trillion/
Let me get this right, we deliberately broke the rules we agreed to and got taken the court for unfair business practices, and now having been "nicked" for breaking the law, our stance is this?Whethere the story is genuine or not, the UK is guilty. Under the basic rules of the community from the outset of our entering the EEC, the law forbade any VAT liable item from being exempted.
The most that could happen was reduction to a 5% rate.
We conformed at first, for example reducing the original full VAT rate on electricity to 5%, but apparently introducing some exemptions later.
.