Of course it was, and methods you should approve of, backed by rampant crime.That's your example? And it wasn't trade that was the problem there. Doh.
Of course it was, and methods you should approve of, backed by rampant crime.That's your example? And it wasn't trade that was the problem there. Doh.
Playing the idiot card again? you know there is a pending police investigation that is carefully being delayed, why aren't you so called Media people chasing it?Illegal acts?
This is interesting. I'm at the BBC today. I know a number of remain leaning journalists who would be delighted to run a story that could bring on a second referendum.
I promise to pass the info on and also promsise to keep your sources out of any public eye. Either let me know on here or please pm me and I will pass the allegations on. I can assure this will be followed up.
I await your evidence eagerly.
Unless you are lying?
Playing the idiot card again? you know there is a pending police investigation that is carefully being delayed, why aren't you so called Media people chasing it?
Because it suits your leave agenda to ignore crime of course.
he preaches to the converted.Great stuff from Toby Young on how 'No-deal' can not be stopped if the govn't is determined to have things go that way:
Solid facts, something you avoid, since you exist only to spread lies and propaganda for the far right while claiming otherwise.Please. Elaborate. Not just vague, unspecified nonsense.
Take that tin foil off your head and let me know what illegal activities you are referring too.
Unless you are lying?
Solid facts, something you avoid, since you exist only to spread lies and propaganda for the far right while claiming otherwise.
You are a fake, fingers, lying as usual
Nobody believes that.No we did not, far too many people were excluded and an illegal targeted last minute propaganda campaign was employed using illegally harvested data.
You know that but lie about it.
The only reason the Referendum couldn't be declared void in law was because it was advisory only and the Torys ignored that too.
If as is claimed TM was a remainer, why didn't she agree the Referendum was void?
And why did she try to get a deal?
Because the leave campaign made all those promises of better times to come to get the public support they needed, and she tried to achieve a deal in, line with that.
Now after all this time she is blamed for something Boris ran away from.
So now what do we have, Boris will be satisfied to get away with nothing for the public , just relief for the swindling rich protecting their off shore assets with a no deal Brexit.
Meanwhile lying through his teeth with another set of promises he has no intention of keeping to keep the plebs happy.
Sorry fingers you are being boring again , seriously, this method you have of acting to fool discredits your position.What facts?
I'm genuinely asking.
Why won't you tell us what you have uncovered? Seriously. I could make you a remain hero.
Unless you are lying?
WrongNobody believes that.
Sorry fingers you are being boring again , seriously, this method you have of acting to fool discredits your position.
There is a story here that you should be investigating, not fooling about as you are
The Police are claiming not to have received documents?
Why aren't they demanding them then?
Big chance for you to get a booby prize there
To suggest that FaceTube, or whatever it’s called, had a major impact on the referendum is preposterous. That type of media is likely to influence younger voters, and even that is a remote possibility. But let’s pretend it did influence them. You have said that young people couldn’t be arsed to vote, and that it’s old gits who voted for Brexit. So by your own logic, FaceTube and data harvesting had little impact.Wrong
To suggest that FaceTube, or whatever it’s called, had a major impact on the referendum is preposterous. That type of media is likely to influence younger voters, and even that is a remote possibility. But let’s pretend it did influence them. You have said that young people couldn’t be arsed to vote, and that it’s old gits who voted for Brexit. So by your own logic, FaceTube and data harvesting had little impact.
The real reason people voted for Brexit is because Leave told a better quality of lie than Remain. It’s that simple.
It’s the same in the US. People voted for Trump because he’s more appealing than the Democrats offering of a sour faced washed up old ex-president ‘s wife. The Democrats haven’t learned from it. They are still whinging and talking America down and promoting that ghastly Gang of Four women.
It’s hilarious. Every time a vote doesn’t go the way the left want it to, it’s the Russians, or it’s FaceTube, or it’s lies, or it’s people are thick. It’s actually because the left aren’t offering what a majority want. Dead simple again.
If the harvesting was illegal, they always could be investigated. It was more a matter of which jurisdiction and whether there was a will, a prospect of conviction and all the other things that determine whether an investigation actually goes ahead.if they harvest data illegally they can be investigated
If the harvesting was illegal, they always could be investigated. It was more a matter of which jurisdiction and whether there was a will, a prospect of conviction and all the other things that determine whether an investigation actually goes ahead.
when Sky asked JC how he is going to stop BJ's brexit, his answer was 'he and his Labour candidates vow to fight inequality'.It’s actually because the left aren’t offering what a majority want. Dead simple again.
JC:
"We have many other policy announcements in place, particularly the ones on the Green Industrial Revolution and the Green New Deal that we're putting forward, and working out more details on our health and social care policies.
"But fundamentally it's about reducing inequality in Britain and about investing in good quality sustainable jobs for the future through the Green Energy Revolution."
when Sky asked JC how he is going to stop BJ's brexit, his answer was 'he and his Labour candidates vow to fight inequality'.
Obviously not to stop brexit.
the 48% desparately needs a leader and who is it going to be?
There is an alternative, the benevolent dictatorship, but since that is impossible to guarantee it's not an option.Another important subject - which I can't see any reply from you about - is me asking you what system of government you would have seeing as you obviously don't believe in democracy.
That's why people don't vote for them.when Sky asked JC how he is going to stop BJ's brexit, his answer was 'he and his Labour candidates vow to fight inequality'.
Obviously not to stop brexit.
the 48% desparately needs a leader and who is it going to be?