That was dislike of your obsession with posting about those two at any slightest excuse. It's an illness you have.
.
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
.
Crikey, are then any pills for that? I heard some people read The Guardian. Unfortunately, only a lobotomy would save them, though the right pills could prevent them from passing it on to their children.
The chart you posted excludes two countries of the United Kingdom.
You can't extrapolate the range of my interests from me pointing that out to you.
He's right. from now on only official peer-reviewed papers can be accepted as evidence. Everything else is opinion, speculation, propaganda or lies.Customarily when you make a claim of half a million jobs being created, or are you sighting "Doing a Boris" as a defence?
Well this is a revelation from the person who magically produced 14 million people and when challenged produces a feeble attempt at an excuse of figures of speech. Quoting Numbers is not a figure of speech . Those of us who have spent our adult lives in numerate disciplines value veracity.
You of course have a right to your opinion, but before going public with it have a duty of care to be informed.
no he has not been found guilty of that charge. His case has not gone to Court yet.
Sweden may want to proceed with extradition but they have not decided on the course of action.
save them from what? from being brainwashed by the Guardian? Perhaps the right choice would be to read nothing and watch youtube. Didn't they say a picture is worth a thousand words? how about the whole video?
You have taken my quote completely out of context.
It was
"Think of sutuation, Assange found guilty of rape and espionage with Abbot home secretary"
It was explanation of a possible scenario in the future. A concept labour seem incapable of thinking about.
It wasnt meant as a literal fact, but having reread my post I see why you could have believed it to be case.
The antidote is catching yours, ie unreasoned support for the people destroying the labour party.
Its isnt the slightest excuse, its exactly why labour aren't, and in current guise never will be, in power. Which they could have been by now. Thats the sad aspect of Corbyn.
coming back to brexit:
John McDonnel for Labour team seems to ask for a second referendum as the legal 'Boris lock' should TM be replaced.
John McDonnel for Labour team seems to ask for a second referendum as the legal 'Boris lock' should TM be replaced.
More the sad aspect of your misunderstanding my posts.
You've repeatedly asked why Corbyn has taken the line he has on Brexit, sitting on the fence. In response I've a number of times explained why he is doing that, but you repeatedly take that to be me supporting him.
It isn't, explaining something doesn't indicate support, it only indicates understanding.
.
You missed the point completely,the opinion of idiots is of no value whatsoever except to serve as a warning,that they have an appeal to people who are easily manipulated.
I listened as you suggested,the man is clearly not right in the head.
Just because he sprinkled a few known facts into the narrative does not make his outrageous claims credible.
It is not bigoted to reject fanatics,and fantasists, and he is both.
Listen if you must but beware of extremists
Changing your stance somewhat now flecc. Cant say I blame you.
No change at all, as all my previous posts on this subject show. Your misunderstanding is your problem, not mine.
However, I'll go back to ignoring anything you post since you seem incapable of changing your obsessions.
.
You keep threatening that but seem compelled to comment and judge.... and talk more BS... You said loads of times you wanted Corbyn to be next PM, to complete the ruination of Utilities.. And that he was playing long clever game... Must have got that from Abbott. To most that would suggest you support Corbyn but you deny it. How odd.
Keep it up flecc..
Last edited:
Those are very interesting comments. The reason I say that is because that's exactly what I thought when I saw a video on his channel, but then I got a link to one of his other ones from somewhere else, so I looked again. By the time I had watched the second, my curiosity got the better of me, and I wanted to see what he's up to. I have now watched all his videos. I still don't understand his agenda, other than maybe his intent to undermine trust in the government, the Crown and the media, but when you put everything he shows together, it's starting to build a picture of something bigger than what we see. He's probably one of your lot, so it might be worth you becoming familiar with his work.
In case anybody is interested, 400,000 people have signed up to Tommy Robinson's new news channel, and it's only been going about a week. When he was on Facebook, he had 1.2 million followers, which was substantially more than any other political representative/activist. Like him or not, his lobby represents a mighty force in politics even though the establishment has done everything they can to silence and hide him. I watch with interest how this is going to develop.
https://www.tr.news/
There are some new platforms on the internet that focus on free speech and claim that they can remain more or less untouchable by state intervention. These could well develop into replacements for Youtube and Twitter. I don't understand how they work exactly, but they're encrypted somehow, not that you'd notice. The Video one is called Bitchute and the messaging one is called Telegram.
https://www.bitchute.com/
https://telegram.org/
https://www.tr.news/
There are some new platforms on the internet that focus on free speech and claim that they can remain more or less untouchable by state intervention. These could well develop into replacements for Youtube and Twitter. I don't understand how they work exactly, but they're encrypted somehow, not that you'd notice. The Video one is called Bitchute and the messaging one is called Telegram.
https://www.bitchute.com/
https://telegram.org/