Yes, when I bought my first house in 1986, it cost 5.1 times my salary and interest rates were about 10%, I think.But that's not how the market works, there's huge exaggeration about housing costs.
Average wage now in 2016 is more like £27,000 and first time buyers often start with a flat. Even in my London borough a one bedroom flat could still crop up at circa £150,000 before all the stocks ran out and they all went to buy-to-rent.
So that was about 5.6 times salary, so what? I bought for the first time in 1961 at 5.3 times my salary, very little different, and that's why I challenge many of the assertions about today's unaffordability. I did it by living in poverty to start with and being patient enough to suffer in silence until inflation over time and working hard for more money got me on top of the situation.
What is wrong now is that today's young people are not prepared to do that. They still insist on running a car, having and using hugely expensive smartphones, going on holidays abroad, having extravagant multi thousand pound weddings and the like. That is why I have absolutely no sympathy with them.
And I've based the above on a London price! There are far cheaper properties elsewhere, this 2016 link details a flat at £15,000, one tenth of my local quote above.
The fact is that if someone really wants a property, it's still as possible as it was for me back in 1961 and again in 1967 when I bought again.
.
I know it took all of my wages to pay the mortgage and we lived of my wife's merger income. As the years ticked on, inflation made life more comfortable.
I think you are right, young people won't put up with it and make the effort in terms of struggling for cash.