Not for beating up his girlfriend? Shouldn't he have been done for both? (Maybe there was some reason but as it reads it appears to suggest that beating up girlfriends is not violent assault.)
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
Amazing that this low life has managed to sell himself to the Press as representing anything other than a simple violent clown, a talent for self Marketing surprising considering the limited intelligence available, but then that is the trade mark of Fascist cannon fodder after all.
This at least is interesting, one of the many names he goes by..
"Victoria Derbyshire introduced me, ‘now we have Wayne King’, "
That will make oldtom's day I suspect!
There probably wasn't enough room on the charge sheet.....
This is the latest cap being sported by the 'remainers' and very appropriate it seems too!
Tom
Tom
It's nearly 2 years and 2 months since the referendum and still, both the tory Cabinet and the tory crazies have no idea, no plan and no way out to secure a good 'Brexit' for the UK.
They’ve failed so it’s time to cancel the whole fiasco. After all it was just lies, electoral fraud and foreign interference anyway.
Mark Carney, the incumbent Governor of the Bank of England, whose appointment was sanctioned by Ca-moron's tory government although he was not British-born, a break from tradition, had this to say recently:
Tom
They’ve failed so it’s time to cancel the whole fiasco. After all it was just lies, electoral fraud and foreign interference anyway.
Mark Carney, the incumbent Governor of the Bank of England, whose appointment was sanctioned by Ca-moron's tory government although he was not British-born, a break from tradition, had this to say recently:
Tom
As others have already commented, it's a two way story, we've also greatly benefited. Just compare the stability of now with the decline into non-existence of both manufacturing and commerce up to 1972 when all our major industries disappeared. Remember the IMF had to take over the running of the UK then to prevent our bankruptcy. We rebuilt within the EU and the IMF haven't had to come in again, proof of the successful influence of the EU. Yes the EU is very far from perfect, but it's very much better than we were managing before and very much better than the present bunch of clueless incompetents running this country.
The EU backings of moves to elsewhere were part of a program to help the poorer regions and in most cases were selective, not moving the main business, just an affordable part of it. Where the main businesses moved it was usually the company itself the instigator, both chasing lower wages elsewhere and wanting to be nearer the core of their international market.
.
Yes, seen that at first hand in my own family, but there's no threat of anyone suffering that from anything going into the Irish Sea from Sellafield.
This is what I'm objecting to, loosely connecting totally unrelated aspects of radiation as evidence of harm.
.
there is still the accumulative effect even if the nuclear wastes are low level.
.. you are simply confusing cause and effect. The EU never directed any of those companies to up sticks and go to other places in Europe. That was the avarice of the stockholders and their boards of directors. What the EU did and do is make it more attractive for those companies,so inclined, to remain inside Europe, rather than setting up in Malaysia.
While you are on the topic, identify the "petty" rules which prevented companies setting up in the disadvantaged area of say Wales?.
I don't know or care about this person, but I would speculate that it is easier to bring a conviction in the case of assult on a policeman. They generally make better witnesses, and are unlikely to withdraw the complaint, as often happens in domestic violence cases.
I am somewhat puzzled by your responses to this thread,and it seems to lack your normal rigour and precision. .. The polluted water of the west Wales coast do pose a health hazard. The radio active residue enters the eco system and affects plants, fish and other animals ,in including mankind. .. the water born material does end up in sands, the sands do get blown into the air, the air carries these particles, they enter the lungs of sheep, cattle and humans.
In the case of both noth Leinster and south East NI , the radio active signaiture is confused by the residual Chernoblyl air born RA deposited in the Mournes and Cooley areas
But also offset by decay and we can only say it's harmful is there is evidence to support that. We already know that nuclear power for electricity production has a limited future so any possible harm from current practices can be calculated on a time basis.
Those who wish to claim harm should do that first and show the evidence.
.
But none of that is evidence of harm, it's only evidence of presence, which is a very loose definition of health hazard, a supposition since there's no quantification.
.
Second response to show just how good for us the EU is:
UK GDP = £2.619 billions.
UK GNP = £0.512 billions
The difference between the two is what the mainly foreign companies who are here bring to us in being based here for EU access.
If we leave the EU we could lose most or all of that difference as they depart, leaving us with under one fifth of our present wealth.
We are told by Brexiters that we can get that from trading with the rest of the world. Strange that we weren't able to before 1972 and haven't been able to during membership, while others like Germany et al have been able to.
.
This infographic from 'A Nation Divided' tells me all I need to know about the corruption extant among mainstream media and tory government:
Tom
Tom
Yes - I wouldn't be surprised if she were very scared. I'd like to think that the original beating would automatically be included even if the girlfriend was unwilling to support a complaint or be a witness.
I'm pleased to see another EU country has taken punitive action against a woman wearing a veil to cover most of her face. The court's view on the matter was well-considered and much as I am committed to the notion of religious tolerance, I firmly believe that this practice, mostly by some members of the Muslim community, should be illegal and offenders punished until they either conform with the laws of the country in which they live or travel through or leave for a state that permits such a dress code.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45064237
Tom
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45064237
Tom
on a lighter note, suppose we have a second referendum and remain won.
What would brexiters think of this?
QUOTE:
The morning after the referendum, we will immediately chuck out the pound and adopt the euro. Is this a good idea? Oh blah blah financial stuff blah. Boring!
As the Brexiters told us once the wheels of hard Brexit started to come off, Brexit was not actually about finances, but about identity. “I never said it would be a beneficial thing to leave [the EU], just that we would be self-governing,” Farage said in June on LBC radio. (It must have been a different Nigel Farage who, on 23 February 2016 tweeted, “British workers will be better off outside EU”.)
Hard remain is similarly ideologically driven, so the remainiacs will announce that Britain’s national language is now Belgian. After some belated Googling reveals there’s no such language, an addendum will clarify that Britain’s national language is now Flemish. Sure, it may not make sense financially, historically or practically; it may not even be possible. But that won’t stop the hard remainiacs shouting, “Saboteur!” at anyone who expresses a qualm.
Next, all chewing gum will be banned except for Hollywood, aka the world’s most disgusting chewing gum, but an essential part of the European experience, as anyone who ever went to mainland Europe as a teenager knows. Other new rules to be implemented will include: all hot chocolate must be drunk out of a bowl instead of a mug; Orangina is the only acceptable fizzy beverage; and only Nutella may be spread on toast, never, ever, ever peanut butter - bof! Though based on nostalgia, like hard Brexit, hard remain is inspired even more by its supporters’ memories of their school French exchanges 25 years ago.
But Brexit wasn’t just about the recent past – it was about a glorious historical past, even if that historical past was, in point of fact, horrible for the people who lived through it. So whereas in 2017 Farage posed solemnly in front of a poster for the movie Dunkirk, as though that film justified Brexit, in 2018 hard remainiacs will pose in front of whatever West End theatre is home to Les Misérables these days. Les Misérables recounts a glorious if bloody moment in France’s history, while the musical itself is France’s greatest cultural contribution. (Don’t @ me.)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/commentisfree/2018/aug/04/flemish-hate-nutella-remainiac-britain-second-brexit-referendum
What would brexiters think of this?
QUOTE:
The morning after the referendum, we will immediately chuck out the pound and adopt the euro. Is this a good idea? Oh blah blah financial stuff blah. Boring!
As the Brexiters told us once the wheels of hard Brexit started to come off, Brexit was not actually about finances, but about identity. “I never said it would be a beneficial thing to leave [the EU], just that we would be self-governing,” Farage said in June on LBC radio. (It must have been a different Nigel Farage who, on 23 February 2016 tweeted, “British workers will be better off outside EU”.)
Hard remain is similarly ideologically driven, so the remainiacs will announce that Britain’s national language is now Belgian. After some belated Googling reveals there’s no such language, an addendum will clarify that Britain’s national language is now Flemish. Sure, it may not make sense financially, historically or practically; it may not even be possible. But that won’t stop the hard remainiacs shouting, “Saboteur!” at anyone who expresses a qualm.
Next, all chewing gum will be banned except for Hollywood, aka the world’s most disgusting chewing gum, but an essential part of the European experience, as anyone who ever went to mainland Europe as a teenager knows. Other new rules to be implemented will include: all hot chocolate must be drunk out of a bowl instead of a mug; Orangina is the only acceptable fizzy beverage; and only Nutella may be spread on toast, never, ever, ever peanut butter - bof! Though based on nostalgia, like hard Brexit, hard remain is inspired even more by its supporters’ memories of their school French exchanges 25 years ago.
But Brexit wasn’t just about the recent past – it was about a glorious historical past, even if that historical past was, in point of fact, horrible for the people who lived through it. So whereas in 2017 Farage posed solemnly in front of a poster for the movie Dunkirk, as though that film justified Brexit, in 2018 hard remainiacs will pose in front of whatever West End theatre is home to Les Misérables these days. Les Misérables recounts a glorious if bloody moment in France’s history, while the musical itself is France’s greatest cultural contribution. (Don’t @ me.)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/commentisfree/2018/aug/04/flemish-hate-nutella-remainiac-britain-second-brexit-referendum