"You say Tomayto, I say Tomarto", as the song goes.Vegemite!
.
"You say Tomayto, I say Tomarto", as the song goes.Vegemite!
There,s a massive difference tho flecc...they never found WMD , the Novichok was found quite easily.The media have neither the access to the material nor the expertise to know.
They are just repeating the original statement, so it could be one lie by one person with everyone repeating it like sheep.
Just like WMD.
.
the team that was tasked with finding WMD in Iraq comprises citizens from a lot of countries. The team that investigates the Salisbury's poisoning is much more restricted. Ask yourself who analyses the samples and who gave the verdict that it was Russian military grade weapon?. Are they the same people?There,s a massive difference tho flecc...they never found WMD , the Novichok was found quite easily.
Like Sky News, Guardian, Times , etal did ?the team that was tasked with finding WMD in Iraq comprises citizens from a lot of countries. The team that investigates the Salisbury's poisoning is much more restricted. Ask yourself who analyses the samples and who gave the verdict that it was Russian military grade weapon?. Are they the same people?
Until the OPCW concludes its findings, we should avoid jumping to conclusion.
No. In Salisbury they either found something, or may have found something, or may not have found something. You don't know that Novichok was found. They announced it was Novichok days before Porton Down were even asked to identify it. Porton Down had to have their arm twisted to reluctantly agree it was of a Novichok "type". It took many days before they say they discovered a contaminated front door that they been guarding all the time. Neither the sequence of announcements or what is being said now makes any sense.There,s a massive difference tho flecc...they never found WMD , the Novichok was found quite easily.
it's nothing to do with mistrusting people who did the analyses. It's the people that come on TV and give us the verdict that I don't trust, for the simple fact that they are career politicians.Like Sky News, Guardian, Times , etal did ?
And yes I trust the folk conducting tests here.
Well it does show how convincing Press releases are,but nothing else.Sky News
"The poison used to target a former spy and his daughter is Russian-made nerve agent novichok."
I could find at least another 6 media sources saying same..
Are posters on here saying they are all wrong, lying or simply deceived...it then begs the question where are posters getting their " more accurate" information from.
What we conclude from this information is subjective, debateable but denying objective statements like the one quoted does not make sense.
Are folk really claiming our labs are not capable of recognising Novichok (s) or are they saying they are lying.???
Well they were immediately wrong there. As I've already posted, Novichok was researched and made in Uzbekistan in the days of the USSR. There is no evidence that Russia ever made any, and Uzbekistan is now an independent country.Sky News
"The poison used to target a former spy and his daughter is Russian-made nerve agent novichok."
A politician with a vendetta? Never!So who will you all believe ? And when ?
And if you don't like their Principles, they can soon come up with others,it's nothing to do with mistrusting people who did the analyses. It's the people that come on TV and give us the verdict that I don't trust, for the simple fact that they are career politicians.
That's quite a shame flecc.A politician with a vendetta? Never!
.
There,s a lot of us about Tom...According to last Yougov survey 73% of folk are in agreement with me on this...
So you are all wrong!...According to last Yougov survey 73% of folk are in agreement with me on this...
If you are told by the Government you don't need real Evidence to make a decision, I'm surprised more by the fact that 27% had the sense to disagree, than that the rest found it convenient to accept what they were told.There,s a lot of us about Tom...According to last Yougov survey 73% of folk are in agreement with me on this...
We have no proof New Zealand exists without visiting it ? No proof man has landed on moon. No proof CIA didn't plan twin towers. We have evidence suggesting the truth, no more on hundreds of things.If you are told by the Government you don't need real Evidence to make a decision, I'm surprised more by the fact that 27% had the sense to disagree, than that the rest found it convenient to accept what they were told.