Polonium can not be traced in usual way but it can certainly be traced.That's the nonsense I've already exposed:
Firstly the claim that where the polonium had been could be followed from its emission traces. That is scientific claptrap, it's impossible. As I've observed and Woosh has confirmed, the alpha emission particles have almost no penetrative ability, they cannot even penetrate the thinnest of tissue paper so leave no trace of where they have been. An alpha particle is essentially a simple helium atom, two protons and two neutrons, too light and bulky to penetrate. The only way it could be traced is if the material itself was carried externally in a leaky container that was dribbling out it's content all the way from Russia and into all places it was claimed to have been found.
Secondly the claim of it being traced on aircraft going back into Russia is even more silly since it would also necessitate the leaky container scenario. Remember, the whole world's annual production is under 100 grams so they hardly be likely to have enough to dribble it out continuously for days.
And why would they risk carrying incriminating evidence back when it could be safely dumped anywhere since it does no external harm? Once such a deed was done they'd dump any left and it's container. It has little value.
The whole cockeyed story is riddled with such nonsense.
I'm betting this was the political inspired conclusion behind the investigation's findings. Knowing that virtually all polonium 210 is produced in Russia before export of much of it, it was realised that blaming Russia was plausible. Therefore this was the story adopted and they decided to guild the lily with some additional seemingly firmer evidence. Thus the story was born about tracing it everywhere it had been, but that as I've shown was their crucial mistake. There are too many people like me who know the subject far too well scientifically and physically to be fooled by such falsehoods.
Russia could easily have done it, so could all the other people and countries they've upset, so could I.
But the "evidence" produced to try to prove it was Russia has no basis in fact. As Zlatan has observed, the public inquiry found that there was no proof in any of the evidential elements, only circumstantial possibilities that didn't rule out anyone else.
.
Lifted from Science Journal ( Is Polinium perfect assassins poison?)
Is Polonium Imperfect Because It Leaves A Trail?
Polonium has one significant drawback. If investigators are alert enough to detect it has been used, they can follow the radioactive trail it leaves on everything it has come into contact with before the killing to find and identify a suspect.
This is what happened in the Litvinenko case. Investigators found traces of polonium in the hotel room where the tea was served and followed the trail backward, matching it with Lugovoi's movements.
For this reason, those using polonium count heavily on their murder weapon not being found.
But there is one thing more that assassins using polonium must be careful about. And that is to not to be killed themselves by it."
Research it again Flecc. Things change, new techniques are developed.
The really difficult bit is determing its use in first place. That was almost by accident in this case. One of researchers happened to have worked with it years ago and suggested checking for it. Doctors thought other poisons were administered and treated accordingly with Prussian Blue to no avail.
They even know about failed attempts and one " dry run". Ie) a meeting took place without the poison and 3 with it. They washed the stuff down the bath on one of missed attempts.
Are you really trying to tell us the investigation manufactured a series of events based on a process which is impossible. Nonesense Flecc.
Last edited: