Before they ban bikes and other small EV's , how about a ban on EV cars then all our lives might be safer. Afaics the rush to rip off follks with expensive EV's is not the answer to our transport needs, some cars don't even need to be in use to be dangerous.
A transporter in Notts on fire with it's load of EV's (hopefully the link works ).
So we carry on using i.c. vehicles and destroy the planet as quickly as possible?
And how are we to get deliveries without vans, increasingly switching to electric? Buses and Trucks too for urban use.
We've created a world where we have to carry on using buses, trucks, vans and cars indefinitely unless we totally redesign and replace everything by going back to a former age of localisation of all supplies in a simpler and less sophisticated world.
That will take at least the two centuries it took to create the mess we are in.
Meanwhile, electric vehicles are a major part of the solution. If you don't believe me ask the railways. Worldwide they abandoned i.c engines long ago.
As for e-car fires, hysterical reporting is not the answer. Governments just need to get a grip of the irresponsible manufacturers like Tesla who use very high capacity cyclindrical cells like 21700 and 18650 in pack formations of several thousands to be able to claim very long ranges combined with very high performance.
That is well known to be very risky and totally unnecessary. One can buy sensible e-cars with sufficient range and moderate performance which are totally free of traction battery fire risk. They use a few hundred physically large but lower density flat cells in a low stress charging and performing environment.
The one I bought almost five years ago (and which is still available) I'll still be using on the original battery in another five years or even ten years time if I am still alive. That won't be going up in flames thanks to using cells designed exclusively for the car job and not those that e-bikes and laptops use which have to be high density and small, so often being stressed and thus more vulnerable to failure.
.