Eh up, here’s the first of the sycophants…
Frankly - it is a ridiculous statement to suggest that newcomers are arrogantly dismissed. On the contrary, what I see are expert people like NielS and Saneagle and others, spending a lot of time patiently helping people who have just joined.
Why are they the experts? Who says they’re experts? Where are their qualifications or expertise? If you search through the thousands of worthless posts and find pictures of their own bikes they’re bodged together pieces of crap. They have to answer every question with ‘don’t do it like that, do it like I did… BECAUSE I SAY SO’. No explanation or expertise… and they can’t accept they’re wrong… they feel threatened when someone actually knows what they’re talking about.
This voltsnamps chap clearly has achieved what he says he has with his throttle… read his original post, the level of descriptiveness etc. He is not going to have made that up!! Then people basically call him a liar… no wonder he’s angry… and really it’s because those people would like to do what he has done but haven’t been able to work it out for themselves. Rather than ask him nicely how he did it, they ridicule him…
Mr Ed is I think maybe thinking about the fact that very expert people poured cold water on his idea about how worthwhile regenerative braking is on a bicycle. I think the 'naysayers' had the upper hand in the physics department. It isn't worthwhile and they said so. It's the truth. A bad idea is a bad idea - end of discussion.
You’re making yourself look like an idiot now! The simulations and real life experience show that hundreds of watts are being wasted as heat when braking down hills. If you can put those watts back into the battery, what’s not to like. Tell me what the ‘upper hand in the physics department’ says about that??
Typical playground bullying… when someone steps in to defend the kid being bullied, the bullies immediately turn on him !!
