Yes, such a posting from a rival is inappropriate, but sorry Frank and Bob, Jim does have the evidence, and it's not necessary for someone who knows this business to see the bike. All the evidence is in front of our eyes, and it's precisely what Jim said, a £100 bike with a kit tacked on, the battery clearly not originally designed into the bike. He's also right in saying it's not a good way to design a good electric bike, and just as right to say there are better bikes out there.
That all makes good sense. Sustain are representing these as quality electric bikes, and have said as much, and that is clearly impossible
Equally, there are a couple of new Synergie owning members happy with their new bikes, but at least two who've had them much longer have made contrary postings, saying it's a route they won't go down again, one very emphatic about that.
A good bike can last a lifetime and be handed down through the generations, and always used to be. So doesn't the irony of a company calling itself Sustain while marketing items destined for a premature end strike any one else as incongruous other than me?
I've no objection to them being available, but let's be clear on their status and kid no-one they are what they aren't. Good value in their group they may be, but it's the junk components group they're in.
.