Search results

you and gray are the same person.

have you ever heard about an IP address? guess not. afraid I cant compensate for thick little xenophobes incomprehension.

gray being tillson makes "him" agreeing just SO funny

you and others like you have created this little xenophobic mess. their casualties in a much less stable post eu world is on your conscience. I'm hoping any such sacrifice has the noble side effect of ridding the world of some of the racist scum that voted brexit.

it is one way of getting rid of racists. I can imagine that may be a nasty experience for you..

not kidding, politics in my youth in Africa is beginning to look sentient compared to this brain-dead populist soap opera. it needs a good war with a few million casualties to focus minds.

expecting a brexitter to recognise the dramatic irony of being that may be expecting too much..

the elephant in the room, to state the obvious, is whether we revert to WTO rules (i.e. hard brexit). I suspect the electorate may not be that different from the business community in being in wait and see mode http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37592866 with a submarine may hoping she can play...

who's rees mogg?

yes, way to go, lets sell our high tech industry and nuclear power to the Chinese and let mcdonalds and google use us as a tax havens.

ah, an opinion. as Eastwood points out, they are like rectums, everyone has one.

90% of economists polled by ipsos mori said brexit will damage uk economy http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/28/poll-shows-economists-overwhelmingly-agree-on-effect-of-brexit/ it's a bit like the consensus on climate change in the scientific community. you will always find a few nut jobs who have...

here's the OECD's take http://www.oecd.org/eco/outlook/economic-forecast-summary-united-kingdom-oecd-economic-outlook-november-2016.pdf note the oecd is funded by most first world countries http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/list-oecd-member-countries.htm in a spirit of reaching out to...

the market/investors are hard nosed and entirely preoccupied with facts. they are not having speculative conversations about perspective. the uk has made a very bad economic decision. it hasn't quite implemented it, and it may not. but foreign investment is fleeing. and well it should.

they haven't been spectacularly wrong with their predictions. the only reason you only half a half an Armageddon is because brexit has only half happened. which "other respected bodies" forecast that brexit will benefit the country? in a more serious vein. do you find yourself instinctively...

brexitters deliberate ignoring of facts runs through this thread, and much of the debate out there in the politics of it. most recently with the blank dismissal of financial authorities like the independent OBR's predictions. It's at the very least half fascinating. Is it denial fuelled by...

there is also the proud English tradition of using subterfuge, changing the subject, focussing on minutia instead of the bigger picture to distract attention from what's really going on. it can be funny, and surrealist, and I can find myself liking it when, say peter cook does it as part of...

ah the English cultural tradition of prioritising form over function, much the way it prioritises shame over guilt, or preoccupies itself with the way things look rather than what they are, or what is true. it's what made slavery possible, much as it will brexit.

doesn't the laywer arguing against a parliament motion being enough to trigger brexit http://news.trust.org/item/20161207121332-szigt/?source=reTheWire just have the right surname?

that's a very academic view. have you been to Zimbabwe? and compared the experience to say Botswana? two very different experiences, one Chinese dominated, the other European/za dominated. any African would tell you Botswana is preferable.