Search results

You would obviously prefer a dictatorship...?? Well obvious I suppose. Stalin I, d guess rather than Hitler..

It can lead to indecisive and frequently changed policies, governments and directions. Italy springs to mind..

And, any party should put forward policies and principles most likely to gain support. Its a fundamental concept of how our democracy works. Voters should not have to bend to accomodate dogma within any party. Its exactly what JC shpuld bedoing now. Representing as many voters as possible, not...

He didnt say he was like Attlee. He said they were both Labour,which obviously they were. Got to admire you stubborn eccentricity.

It took a long time and a war to find out? (1994 to 2007)

He did so tho flecc with the complete support of Labour movenent at the time. (ok Majority support) An individual can not take a political party where it doesnt want to go. Had they not supported him and he had rissen to power in a Hitler fashion I would agree with you. He didnt. He was elected...

I do see where flecc is coming from. In effect however it simply means Labour didnt represent his vision of Labour, or pehaps even accepted vision of labour at time.However because Blair was elected democratically by labour party members, labour party MPs etc etc at the time it was Labour...

When he listened to Bush..

He would still be in power had it not been for Bush/Iraq/Kelly etc etc..

So would I and millions of others.

Arguing Blair was not labour is both stupid and dangerous. Examine his route to leader of Labour party (before PM) and he needed support of majority of Labour MPs, majority of Labour party members, majority of unions and a majority of all socialist societies. He was Labour but didnt follow...

Totally agreed.

Like they say flecc, success has many fathers, failure an orphan. Without Labour party Blair would not have existed,he was a product of it and New Labour of him.

No, you are wrong flecc. No mention lof New Labour anywhere. Just labour. He attracted Labour voters and lots of Tories with his Tory Poliicies but he was Labour Leader. Says so in wicki. No such Party as New Labour. Just a set of idealogies within the Labour party.

Kept Rotherham up so he must know what he, s on about...

Agreed there are quite a few policies Blair championed that Tories have run with. He also dealt with unions in a much more tory fashion after using them to help gain power. As to wether he was Tory or Labour is arguing semantics and pointless. What is beyond dispute is the damage he did to...

As far as policies and behaviour they sure were but those supporting them certainly werent.

My apologies. Thought it was same..

Click on attach files (below window) then simply select required file from your directory.. Click on upload.. Then select thumb nail or full size. Then save.

Not sure whats so boring Robo... But each to his own..