D
Deleted member 4366
Guest
That's a good point about the design speed. The design speed of say an Oxygen MTB is 25km/h. Derestricting it, doesn't change its design speed, so derestricting it doesn't change it into a moped.
We aren't at odds on this, my wish for throttles is only in respect of those who are unable to always ride pedelec only through some minor physical impairment. The key phrase in my comment repeated below is "more riders", i.e. the physically impaired. The rest of us are already empowered with pedelec control.All you're doing by asking to allow eBikes with throttles and more power is bypassing the laws and regulations around mopeds isn't it? Wrapping it up to look like you're "empowering riders" isn't really what it is, is it?
hmm, slightly the wrong way round there d8veh, even by your own definitiion.That's a good point about the design speed. The design speed of say an Oxygen MTB is 25km/h. Derestricting it, doesn't change its design speed, so derestricting it doesn't change it into a moped.
there seems to be a natural separation of the market. People who like bikes with throttle naturally buy Chinese bikes and people who like bikes with torque sensor buy German CD bikes. Perhaps people who buy bikes with hub motors would rather have a throttle than a torque sensor.Here's a possible spanner in the works regarding throttles.
1) As I've observed previously a torque sensor is a foot operated throttle over the whole permitted assist speed range and that's legal.
.
But throttles not only benefit those with leg disabilities. There's also those with limited energy.2) Those who cannot pedal a bicycle through some leg disability can ride hand operated bicycles legally, and these come in various forms, including with a hand cranked chainwheel ahead of the rider.
.
Sorry torrent99, I don't understand what you mean. For a moment, I thought you were advocating that hand-operated throttles should be available to anyone who wants one but you make a distinction between hand-throttle and just 'throttle-controlled'.But throttles not only benefit those with leg disabilities. There's also those with limited energy.
Also leg disabilities often go hand in hand with other joint problems, generalised dodgy joints, which make hand operated pedals just as problematic. Dodgy shoulder or back anyone?
I don't think hand operated bikes (though useful for some), offer an alternative to throttle controlled ebikes.
The throttle controlled bike (with limited speed of 10/15mph) addresses a multitude of problems and provides a means of transport and recreation for a potentially very large number of people.
That's total ball cocks. Oxygen bikes are designed and certified to comply with EN15194, which is the standard for electrically asisted pedal cycles. If it were designed as a moped, there would be a bracket on the back for a number plate.hmm, slightly the wrong way round there d8veh, even by your own definitiion.
The Oxygen has a design speed of ABOVE 25km/h and is then restricted to 25km/h... so by derestricted you're actually allowing it to do its design speed.
This is of course true of pretty much all pedelecs, but is an important point if you're going to pick on the phrase "design speed".
Thats exactly what I'm saying! If the bike has to be RESTRICTED to 25kph, then its design speed is above 25kph by definition. So if you're going to use the design speed arguement, you'll find that pretty much all pedelecs are designed to go above 25kph and then restricted to the legal requirements to each country.That's total ball cocks. Oxygen bikes are designed and certified to comply with EN15194, which is the standard for electrically asisted pedal cycles. If it were designed as a moped, there would be a bracket on the back for a number plate.
Are you saying that KTMs are designed as mopeds because they can also be derestricted.
no... your argument was:The design incorporates a governing system to prevent power above 25km/h. Your argument is a bit like saying aircraft are designed to crash because if you switch off the control systems, they will fall out of the sky, or, boats are designed to sink because they have removable skin fittings.
You could also say that it's down to good old fashioned engineering tolerances/over engineering. Technically it's components are capable of more than 25kph, however restrictions are put in place to ensure that the components are not used to their maximum capacity. This provides good performance in the designed range, greater reliability, greater longevity etc etc.That's the same argument that aeroplanes are designed to crash otherwise they wouldn't need control systems. It's a fact that an aeroplane will crash without a control system, but it's not designed to crash. The control system is an integral part of the design, just like the control system in an Oxygen bike. Pilots can override the control system in an aeroplane just like bike riders can on their electric bike if they know how. No reasonable person would say that aeroplanes are designed to crash.
And often higher efficiency too, when the restricted speed corresponds to the point of highest motor efficiency, as it often does.You could also say that it's down to good old fashioned engineering tolerances/over engineering. Technically it's components are capable of more than 25kph, however restrictions are put in place to ensure that the components are not used to their maximum capacity. This provides good performance in the designed range, greater reliability, greater longevity etc etc.
Which brings us back to TS versus SS with throttle again. A torque sensor electrically assisted bicycle is human powered, and the motor works by multiplying the human input. A speed sensor bike works by just turning the cranks which then acts as a switch and gives full power. Or by operating the throttle. So by your definition a speed sensor machine with a throttle is not a bicycle at all.Yes to me my bike is a Hybrid neither a cycle or a moped, its something inbtween. When it is powered by the use of throttle or sensor to me changes the definition of what it is. A bicycle is something that is human powered. Once you motorise it you change that.
You'll never find total agreement within any trade body, as everyone always has a mix of common and individual business interests to consider.I agree but unfortunately our UK dealers don't appear to be able to agree with each other on the direction of the independent electric bicycle market.
BEBA was absorbed into the BAGB, I considered this a bad move when it was announced.
It is associating itself with the purist cycle companies but the product is neither a bicycle or a moped/motorbike it lies directly between the two as a unique product all on its own and shouldn't be constrain by the pre-conceptual restraints of the other two markets it should develop its own market if it wants to progress itself and its customer base.
The motorcycle industry successfully broke away from the Bicycle Association and fight for their own ground,
I believe that is something the electric bicycle industry should consider if they could ever compromise on their own internal differences.