No you read it correctly the first time.Sorry Artstu, I re read your post and you said you would take low power and assist over speed, this is exactly what I am saying lol, my fault, I am not really interested in top speed either but the ability to get up hills.
So if the bike has gearing for 32 mph, I want it to assist me up to that, a bike that works with me all of the time if I choose to want it to. Not some overpowered rocket ship that flies up hills and then becomes a slug at 15.5 mph.To me it does, sorry. I'd take low power and assist to whatever speed the bike is capable of any day.
Ans we have very different needs for the ebike too, but thanks for your opinionAs a purchaser AND returner of the BS10 due to its illegality for road use together with its almost insurability I would suggest that you reconsider your purchase .I settled for a compliant Kalkoff .The IMPULSE Harmony Nu Vinci.I am a cyclist not a Dealer and talk from personal experience
What you need to do is deceive the operators of the scheme by telling lies. You tell them that you are buying a bicycle when in fact your intention is to buy a moped which you will ride uninsured, unregistered and all of the other things.Getting back to the crux of the OP - how can someone get an illegal bike on any of the C2W schemes?
Good points, but don't forget that your bike was illegal when you bought it, and, technically, still is. Where does one draw the line?What you need to do is deceive the operators of the scheme by telling lies. You tell them that you are buying a bicycle when in fact your intention is to buy a moped which you will ride uninsured, unregistered and all of the other things.
You do need to be comfortable with lies, fraud, committing traffic offences, jeopardising Ebike easements in law and putting at risk the cost savings benefits of Cycle to Work type schemes, so quite a self centred and generally dishonest attitude is helpful too.
Did I mention stupid? You do need to have been blessed with a good dollop of stupidity. Stupidity helps you construct the case for illegal bikes by enabling the conception of such phrases as:
"I used to ride a fast motorbike, so I know how to use speed appropriately."
"The 15 MPH cut off is too slow. I can exceed this speed down hill and road bikes pass me at a higher speed."
"The police don't care and are not at all knowledgeable about Ebike law, so I have nothing to worry about."
"I don't like the 15 MPH assist cut off, it doesn't suit me."
"Car drivers aren't restricted, why should I be?"
The very stupid believe that all of the above form the basis of a justification for riding an illegal bike. They can't understand that an Ebike, which is effectively a motorised vehicle, enjoys some very generous easements in law. Very generous indeed when you look at the restrictions placed on other forms of motorised transport. But for the stupid, this isn't enough, they want more and more. If the limit was raised to 25 MPH, they'd want 30. What the stupid and dishonest really want is motorbike / moped performance with bicycle legislation and bicycle running costs in terms of tax and insurance. That is their Holly Grail.
I can empathise with the guys who stick to selling the legal bikes. These traders stick to the rules and act responsibly, whilst the irresponsible ones effectively undercut / undermine them with their illegal offerings. Some credit must go to those who trade in legal bikes, because if everyone sold the 15 MPH+ mopeds, make no mistake about it, something would be done and we would all suffer the consequences. There must be a temptation to trade in illegal bikes in order to achieve a few more sales, so well done for being principled and resisting. The only reason that we get away with it now is that thankfully only the dishonest, selfish and stupid dabble in the illegal market.
totally agreed, but I'd suggest it does need saying though...doesnt it, even if its every time. Because it only takes one extra person to stumble across this discussion and it'll be someone who will now know the situation, and won't be sold an illegal bike without knowing the potential problems and damage they are doing to the image of eBikes and industry as a whole.I love all this - really! It's great entertainment. I don't know how many times we've been through it before. Nothing's changed. It's a bit like watching your favourite comedy film. You start laughing before the funny bits because you know what's coming.
Draw the line......EN15194....now I'llGood points, but don't forget that your bike was illegal when you bought it, and, technically, still is. Where does one draw the line?
Dell Boy just fell over the bar counter!!!!I love all this - really! It's great entertainment. I don't know how many times we've been through it before. Nothing's changed. It's a bit like watching your favourite comedy film. You start laughing before the funny bits because you know what's coming.
Ah, my old LaFree, I'm going to well up in a minuteA bit of exaggeration there Tim!
The sophisticated Giant Lafree lite (below) was here in 2001 years before you started up and the Yamaha PAS models in 1999, a long way before you appeared. Both were quality good performing pedelecs and hardly monsters. The Lafree weighed just 22 kilos fully equipped with mudguards, mudflaps, strong carrier, lights, propstand and wheel lock, a weight many manufacturers still struggle to get down to today for such a well equipped e-bike.
Both are still in regular use and the Lafree in particular remains a highly valued pedelec for numerous owners.
Yes, that's the Lite model, rode beautifully like a normal bike when with power switched off. No e-bike I've ever ridden since matched it in that respect.Ah, my old LaFree, I'm going to well up in a minute
Actually, I did have 3 or 4 at one time, but this one was my favourite