Child intimidated to death.Getting back to the original story, it seems there has been another pursuit https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65850704
Getting back to the original story, it seems there has been another pursuit https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65850704
Good point. Maybe in the survey all the previous questions were about people breaking into houses, stealing stuff and doing violence, or whoever conduct the survey gave a spiel about those things before asking the questions. It's easier to do your own one with family and friends, and I can guarantee there won't be many that want government surveillance in their homes. On the other hand, a lot of people seem to like those Alexa devices that are monitored by whoever.Clearly been manipulated or those taking part werent asked that precise question.
Errr - no. Another hooligan took off, lost the cops up an alleyway and killed himself by driving into another vehicle. People like you want to live in a Mad Max kind of dystopia where morons do as they like and prey on the rest of us. The more rope you give the likes of these 'characters' the worse they get. Don't ask me how I know.Child intimidated to death.
Yes. This needs saying, and loudly.The more of these drug mules/hooligans who kill themselves with those bikes , then the safer it will be for others.
Are you familiar with the notion of 'diversion'?
Are you familiar with the notion of 'diversion'?
It is a tactic used by argumentative folk who have lost the argument. What you do is slide the thread in another direction. The question of American, Southern States historic bad policy, has nothing to do with delinquents in the UK crashing their motorbikes when fleeing police attention. I am not in possession of any information about race, or sterilisation in these UK cases. Your post is an irrelevant diversion.
You seem confused.
You seem confused.
Offenders taking themselves out of the gene pool by their own foolish actions isn't eugenics.
It's involuntary suicide.
.
That could be a graph of many things, the title or source is needed to make sense of your contribution.
As I remarked before, it's Lenny who is confused. He was replying to my comment on his inappropriate suggestion that eugenics were in play in the thread subject responses.His graph is a bit confusing, it is supposed to illustrate Relative poverty rates based on incomes after housing costs
I think the law prefers the term misadventure in such circumstancesYou seem confused.
Offenders taking themselves out of the gene pool by their own foolish actions isn't eugenics.
It's involuntary suicide.
.