So just to be fair and scientific about this, I should ask just how good is the evidence that Powerbyke, Whisper and others are doing it better. Does anyone have any quantitative data or test reports? Has anyone had problems with them?
Nick
I don't think it's the case that the eZee battery is necessarily dud, and the much longer life I got from the very efficient Q bike over the Torq is a clue to that.
The problem is mainly that eZee have some of the most powerful motors in e-biking, and at full throttle they give the battery a pounding, something that no-ones Li-ion enjoys. Some suppliers openly acknowledge the unsuitability of lithium with high power demand by only supplying NiMh with their most powerful motors, Cyclone being one such supplier.
There is an answer in part by using the techniques that the most successful with Li-ion like Panasonic and BionX use, more software control to keep the power demand in strict check, but that would compromise the high power appeal and remove some of the point of the eZee models.
That this rigid control is the answer though is well illustrated by the satellite use I've referred to before. Perfectly ordinary Li-ion cobalt batteries are launched to do a 10 year duty cycle with over 3600 charges. How? They only use one seventh of their capacity once each 24 hours, and that usage is identical every day. They also have identical recharge of that one seventh every 24 hours, and each of those at exactly the same time in each day. In those chemically ideal conditions, long life is made easily possible.
On a powerful throttle controlled bike with low level software control, the rider can and does provide the complete opposite, huge variations that both overload and give the chemistry little chance of settling. Clearly the rider needs to be taken out of the equation more with these batteries, something better software control can do.
A larger capacity/larger cathode eZee battery would help a lot, a route that Wisper took with the 14 Ah battery, since they too had cut out incidences on their most powerful bike at the time, the 905e. To get that larger capacity within the same space demands the reuse of cobalt cathodes, very unpopular after all the publicity over fires in these. Wisper's supplier, Lishen, got round this in part by using a hybrid Manganese Cobalt cathode, but as we've heard from David of Wisper, they're now returning to the lower capacity 10 Ah size, but with improved battery management, exactly as I recommend above.
I would have liked to have seen a slower transition from NiMh to lithium, but the latter proved so good in small applications that there seemed little reason not to switch.
.