I sort of agree but only in the short term
I can’t see electric cars still going well on there original batteries at 10 yrs and 200,000 plus miles which I see a lot of Internal combustion engines still on there original running gear doing regular
I can’t see them doing 100k plus
I hope to be proved wrong because we do need something as a replacement for fossil fuels but it’s not going to be a viable financial option for many people let alone the range issues for a long time
I find this all the time with this subject, too much negativity.
One Leaf has already done over 100,000 miles in 6 years! Bought as a West of Engand taxi, it's operated continuously ever since for that and is still using the original battery, the owner claiming little loss of range.
There'll be plenty more like that since e-cars are inherently much more able than i.c cars to do very high trouble free mileages. The simple fact is that there's so little to go wrong or wear out.
Take my Leaf as an example. There's a controller and an electric motor driving the front wheels directly through a simple reduction gearbox. Those are never remotely near stressed since flat out continuous driving is simply impossible in today's road traffic. There's no radiator, water pump, alternator, starter motor, clutch, gearchanging box, camshaft drive belt or chain.
There's not even brakes wearing out, since like most I'm now flipping to Eco in urban driving since the motor regen does all the in-town braking for me. I'm informed that brake pad replacements on Leafs are very rare.
The service schedule is a joke, it's just looking to see if anything is falling off! The first actual action is at 18,000 miles and once again just looking, this time checking the oil level in the reduction gearbox and checking other fluids as usual.
The battery like most e-cars now is warrantied to 8 years for 75% remaining capacity. It will then cost circa £5000 to replace, but so what when the running costs have been so low. Go with GreenEnergy's extra low late night rate of 4.99 pence per kW and that's equal to 400 miles per gallon cost. The saving on fuel and very low service and repair costs over 8 years will look after battery replacement.
As for financial viability, I don't see a problem since their prices have been continuously falling. Eight years ago the basic Leaf was launched at £32,000, replacement battery at 5 years £16,000.
My vastly superior model cost £24,000 (excluding my extra cost of getting electricity to the garage), and the replacement battery cost has plunged and is forecast to drop further. The Leaf is the size of a Focus and if you check the equivalent top of the range Focus you'll find its costs about the same.
As for range, I think there's huge exaggeration about drivers needs. The great majority of all drivers needs are met with an over 150 mile range, and that's here now. As usual it's the media wittering on about range anxiety that's created unnecessary fears.
One of my neighbours for example, says he couldn't buy one due to range anxiety. It turns out the longest run return trip he ever does is two thirds of my range, and he only does that in the warmer months of the year when the range is at its highest. So his range anxiety exists only in his imagination.
There are things wrong about electric cars and here's the list:
A quarter of people nationally and a third in London have no home electricity access for a charge point.
The public charging point network is far from satisfactory. There's plenty of them, but the way they are run and used is not good enough.
Electric cars in general can't tow anything, so no caravans or car trailers.
For a minority the range is insufficient.
The reliability and very low needs of electric cars mean they are very bad news for the motor trade and the petroleum industry.
They are also turning out to be bad news for the manufacturers, since they end the days of changing the car every three years, most keeping them very long term.
.