Biassing things in favour of better equipment is not something I'm ashamed about. Part of the aim is to encourage better technology.
There's also the "credibility" test. What would an intelligent media reporter make of it?
100 miles without recharging is a 100 mile EV.
100 miles with en route recharging is still a 100 mile EV.
But swapping batteries halfway is two journeys by a 50 mile EV.
Nick
I can understand the desire to reward better equipment and would like to see that rewarded too but it all depends on which part of 'better' you're trying to address.
My 10A charging option uses a 25A Benchtop PSU powering a Bantam 902 RC charger (charges every different battery chemistry up to 50V, at charge rates up to 10A 200Wmax). The PSU+Charger combo weighs in at around 3.5kg. The switchmode PSU also burns around 35W of juice just sitting there doing nothing.
My Panasonic charger charges only one kind of battery and only at 1.8A. It weighs in at 0.75kg. 54Watts of charge power in total.
My Ping battery charger delivers 4A and weighs 400g.
The benchtop combo is clearly 'better' as it charges faster, but the Ping charger is also clearly 'better' is it offers a charge to weight ratio of 300W/Kg (versus 72W/kg for panasonic or 57w/kg for benchtop combo)
Perhaps some of the bias could be removed by carrying the charger on the bikes too? (e.g. everyone charging their bikes takes along whatever they need to plug into UK mains outlet). That way, people like me with big switchmode DC supplies and RC chargers would be penalised by having to carry them around for the duration of the route, but people with small lightweight chargers would not.
If I had to carry the charger(s), I would take the ping battery+charger and a couple of panasonic batteries which wouldn't get recharged.
If I didn't have to carry the charger, I would clearly use the benchtop combo plus two panasonic chargers to top up all three batteries.