Have to agree...what a berk, surely he could have arrested him for wasting police time. Pompous twerp in need of a good slap (joke)What an arrogant, smug, self satisfied pratt - the cyclist that is
Have to agree...what a berk, surely he could have arrested him for wasting police time. Pompous twerp in need of a good slap (joke)What an arrogant, smug, self satisfied pratt - the cyclist that is
So on the one hand you seem to criticise them for checking you had your lights on and in the very next sentance seem to complain that they never stop those without their lights on!Wish I could've seen their faces when they saw my back light turned on.
The amount of times I've seen cyclists without lights on the main roads is ridiculous and I've never seen any of them stopped by police.
What's wrong with having a child seat on the back if it's of a suitable standard and fitted properly?Am I the only one to wonder why any parent would put their child at risk by cycling on a public road with the child on board
That's a bit strong and I disagree entirely.(in this particular case I think the parent was being criminally negligent and it was a good thing that the police did stop him)
What an arrogant, smug, self satisfied pratt - the cyclist that is
Some cycle paths have the right of way but not many, there's a formula the council should use to work it out but many don't bother.I am in Denmark and whether we are on a cycle path or on a road we have the right of way as cyclists. Having said that I have found that discretion is the better part of valour. But on the whole we are kings of the road.
If I ride down a cycle path , cars coming out of side roads or turning across the cycle path must give way to me and they certainly do.
I would hate to be riding in the UK.
Steve
I don't understand that, I find zebra crossing more dangerous.Am I the only one to wonder why any parent would put their child at risk by cycling on a public road with the child on board, no matter where the seat is (in this particular case I think the parent was being criminally negligent and it was a good thing that the police did stop him)
I think it very sad that Boris Johnson keeps getting the credit for what Ken Livingstone has done. Almost all of London's cycling infrastructure and the free cycle route maps were Kens innovation, the cycle superhighways scheme was already under way, as was a bike hire scheme.As nuts as I think Boris is, I think he has taken some big steps in London to go in the correct direction.
My work and home are both on National Cycle Route 1, it is an almost traffic free route out from the centre of London. It's slow with lots of obstructions, if I stick to it then my journey will take about three times as long.I must say that I disagree withe OP.
We have a difficult enough time getting cycle paths and or shared pedestrian/cycle paths.
If cyclists refuse to use them, then the likelihood of more is low.
If there is something wrong with the path, then complain to get it improved.
Without a good reason not to use it, then all the backroom lawyers home made advice will not help you if you come before the Magistrates on a 'cover all' charge such as cycling without reasonable consideration etc. Any normal person would think you are nuts not to use the path.
The Police officer has a sworn legal duty to protect life and property. Whether if what he actually said to you is legally correct or not is of no account, he was trying to protect you.
Far too many are impractical or downright unusable. Thin tyred sports bikes in particular can't cope with broken surfaces or gravel.Still don't think it a good idea not to use cyclepaths where provided.