Further to my above post, the notion that some have expressed that a private prosecution might be brought is frankly silly. The CPS would follow official policy, and that is clearly for harmonisation at 250 watts with no contrary action meanwhile. Those seeing problems in the current status are simply failing to realise that as a matter of principle, anyone representing government cannot say the law is wrong.
Such waivers are not unusual and they have existed previously in many areas, including our own. An example is the Countryside Act 1968.
Legislation concerning bicycles usually includes the wording "bicycles, tricycles and bicycles with four or more wheels", but the permission to use bridlepaths included in that countryside act only included bicycles.
Following representations from tricyclists, Sustrans, the government backed sustainable transport organisation, successfully sought a waiver from the DfT for tricycles to be permitted, and that was the informal status for long afterwards.
It may still be, but that act has had many amendments since so the change may have subsequently been written into law, as this waiver will be in due course.
This really is a silly fuss about nothing. Anyone remember the very many years that London taxicab drivers were required by the Hackney Carriage acts to carry a bale of hay on board for their hypothetical horse's welfare? That law was only rescinded quite recently and no-one using an ic cab had ever been prosecuted over that century of the measure being in force. Also I believe it's still an imprisonable offence for a woman to wear make-up, it certainly was a long way into my lifetime.
.
