Being around at the time, also a cyclist and in the trade, I know how true this is. Almost half the country cycled in the 1940s and '50s, virtually all males. It was all they could afford and public transport was very deficient following WW2 damage and lack of maintenance. Bicycles and and the occasional bus were mostly what there was on the main roads in built up areas and the main roads out of town were incredibly empty.While a lot of the NL is flat, they have very strong winds, so in many cases it is as bad as going uphill. It also rains quite often. But it does not put them off. We used to have a large number of people cycling in the UK, despite the weather and the hills.
I repeat as before, it was dying long before that. The petrol cyclemotors from 1950 on started the rot when they became so popular. Since they had to be registered, insured, number plated and test taken since they had to be ridden with a full motorcycle driving licence, it left the over a million who bought them very easily able to swap when they became better off, onto scooters like the Vespa and Lambretta after they arrived early in that decade.but I believe cycling was deliberately killed off here in the 60s and 70s.
Getting used to being powered with more weather protection soon lead them into cars. My boss in the motorcycle and cycle trade who had only ever ridden motorcycles previously and owned a 1000 cc Brough Superior, changed that for a Hillman Minx in 1954. Tame in comparison, but much more useful for him and his family. By 1960 Britain's US style motoring future was already sealed and by 1970 there was hardly any adult utility cycling to be killed off. It was a kids activity on chopper bikes and the like.
.
Last edited: