he can't say anything other than Russia will be a constant and present danger to its neighbours, more so those with a large Russian population like his own country.When I read your above post I was certain that you have completely misread the Russia / Putin position.
Latvia borders Russia and has between a quarter and a third Russian Population so they know a lot more than most of the Russian position.
I've just been listening to Krisjanis Karins who was Latvia's Prime Minister up into last year and is still a current Minister. He believes, like others in Europe, that Russia is a current threat to NATO neighbouring countries.
He categorically insists that Russian policy will not change at all if Putin goes.
.
Shell are closing all their hydrogen filling stations in California. That must be very annoying for anyone there, who invested in a hydrogen car. The rumours are saying it was for safety reasons, but probably just not economical to do it on a smal scale. The Japs are still investing heavily in the technology, but not much point in buying one if you can't fill it up.
shell pull out of california hydrogen - Google Search
www.google.com
Yes he's completely the opposite, but once again a misreading of the true Russian position. They really have swallowed the "Nazis in Ukraine" line more completely than I could ever have imagined could happen.However, Putin is so different to Gorbachev and Yetsin, so there is no reason to think that change can't or won't happen.
True, but once again, this is not all about climate change. Air pollution is a much bigger and more immediate issue in our cities and very large towns, so an energy cost to get rid of diesel becomes acceptable meanwhile, until we find better ways.You need 40kwh to produce 1kg of hydrogen. 1kg of hydrogen generates 20kwh in your fuel cell. Hydrogen is at least 100% more expensive than battery. Battery gravimetric capacity can be improved up to 5 times current level, so hydrogen cannot compete for the foreseeable future.
but we already have a better way of dealing with pollution, electric cars and buses. There is no real need for hydrogen, especially when most of it is still produced from natural gas. The only way that hydrogen is justified is when it's a by-product like in nuclear reactors. Even then, it would be better just to burn it on site. I can see a small possibility for those who want to setup solar to hydrogen in the Sahara but there again, it's doubtful that it would work economically.True, but once again, this is not all about climate change. Air pollution is a much bigger and more immediate issue in our cities and very large towns, so an energy cost to get rid of diesel becomes acceptable meanwhile, until we find better ways.
.
No we haven't yet for buses, even when stuffed full of cells in every space to a potentially dangerous degree, like the staircase full of them. The battery electric buses are ok for most routes, but we are using the hydrogen fuel cells for the longer routes.but we already have a better way of dealing with pollution, electric cars and buses. There is no real need for hydrogen
Not yet but I will watch. Hopefully better that Musk's disastrous attempt at demonstrating it recently when it scared him!BTW, did you see the demo of Tesla FSD V12? Quite a progress.
The video on the Verge website is last year.Not yet but I will watch. Hopefully better that Musk's disastrous attempt at demonstrating it recently when it scared him!
Elon Musk’s FSD v12 demo includes a near miss at a red light and doxxing Mark Zuckerberg
/ The 45-minute video was meant to demonstrate v12 of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving but ended up being a list of things not to do while using FSD.
Definitely much improved in some areas but still falling well short in others. One step backwards for each one forwards is a clear indication of not coping with the scale of the complexities.There is still a lot to do but progress is pretty rapid.
I did like the way it handles road bumps and parkings.
Maybe the answer is the trolley bus.No we haven't yet for buses, even when stuffed full of cells in every space to a potentially dangerous degree, like the staircase full of them. The battery electric buses are ok for most routes, but we are using the hydrogen fuel cells for the longer routes.
Having fond memories of them during my eight years in Bournemouth I fully agree, but of course they and we generally have unwisely got rid of them while many other countries still keep them.Maybe the answer is the trolley bus.
It'll be interesting to see if it works as well on dry roads, when cars and other objects aren't reflected and appear smaller.The video on the Verge website is last year.
This latestest release was earlier this week. I'll dig out the video for you.
There is still a lot to do but progress is pretty rapid.
I did like the way it handles road bumps and parkings.
They should all be considered pre-release/buggy until they actually work safely with other road and pavement users, this business of using the rest of us as guinea pigs is insane.It's already released to the public since Wednesday. Tesla staff can upgrade their cars before the public release.