I recently noticed the Orbea Gain bikes. In particular I like the Urban range. It really seems to be a great option for city and medium-short range commuting. Does anybody own one? There isn't much user information about them.
The worry for me is the integrated battery. Like all batteries it has a finite life and I'd be concerned about its availability. There's only a tiny market for this kind of low power assist e-bike and Orbea is a Spanish company.I recently noticed the Orbea Gain bikes. In particular I like the Urban range. It really seems to be a great option for city and medium-short range commuting. Does anybody own one? There isn't much user information about them.
Spain not being a cycling nation...The worry for me is the integrated battery. Like all batteries it has a finite life and I'd be concerned about its availability. There's only a tiny market for this kind of low power assist e-bike and Orbea is a Spanish company.
.
Yes I know Spain is a cycling nation, but both BH and Orbea were very late into e-bikes, Orbea especially just buying in Dutch e-bikes and rebadging them for a while. Orbea themselves say the Gain model has light assistance and say this "Gain was designed to enhance your ride, not dominate it."Spain not being a cycling nation...
Mallavia is a town with some of those +20% gradients we often talk about. They call them "streets". And just on the north side is the industrial area with Spains largest bike manufacturer. Maybe the idea of "light assist" was born while riding back home from work?
The battery comes out of the bottom of the tube in the BB area
View attachment 25226
So it should be easy enough to re-cell when it wears out. Ebikemotion is another company from Biscay.
Copy/Paste is your friend :Going back to the original question, I've had my Gain for 10weeks now and whilst mine is a D20, i.e. with dropped bars on, the motor, battery etc are the same.
To save a lot of retyping, see this topic on CycleChat where I've given my insight.
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/orbea-gain.229793/
Hi Flecc, remember me? We interacted quite a lot 10 years ago when I first joined this forum (I was chris_bike then, but lost the account when I retired and forgot to change my email!). In those days, I was an evangelist for Cytronex and, if my memory serves me well, you were quite sceptical?The worry for me is the integrated battery. Like all batteries it has a finite life and I'd be concerned about its availability. There's only a tiny market for this kind of low power assist e-bike and Orbea is a Spanish company.
This isn't a small risk since it's happened before. One in frame battery bike from one of the USA's biggest suppliers, Izip, had no battery availablity after only one year when they discontinued the model, and no substitute was ever made available.
.
Hi Chris. Yes I remembered you straight away when you posted earlier. My scepticism in the early Cytronex days was based on the mainstream demand at that time for ever bigger batteries, with Cytronex going against that trend. But of course it was for a specialised market.Hi Flecc, remember me? We interacted quite a lot 10 years ago when I first joined this forum (I was chris_bike then, but lost the account when I retired and forgot to change my email!). In those days, I was an evangelist for Cytronex and, if my memory serves me well, you were quite sceptical?
Actually, I think the original Cytronex was a game changer, but I'm much less impressed with the most recent offering.
I only rehearse this because your worries about the Orbea battery remind me of some of those conversations. Surely the key issue is that the ebikemotion kit is now being fitted by at least three major international manufacturers. The same can be said of the Fazua solution that has been adopted by Pinarello, hardly an insignificant player, but even newer to ebikes than Orbea.
I suspect these two systems will become the industry standard for about the next ten years when, like Cytronex, they'll get replaced by something better.
I think we agree! I also think another point you made 10 years ago is pertinent. Some of the attraction of these new bikes depends on the fitness if the rider and what they are looking for. Orbea's "Just Enough" marketing is commendably honest. The motor delivers lowish torque by comparison with some (about 40Nm, I think the Fazua is 60). This WILL translate to more rider effort on hills (although owners contributing to these fora seem content). But a less powerful motor will also deliver greater range and that is a big thing with road cyclists.Hi Chris. Yes I remembered you straight away when you posted earlier. My scepticism in the early Cytronex days was based on the mainstream demand at that time for ever bigger batteries, with Cytronex going against that trend. But of course it was for a specialised market.
I agree with you about the end of the bottle battery for that market now, the integrated designs are so much more appealing, stylish and often truly stealthy. They'll gain in capacity too as batteries advance, so could eventually become more mainstream.
.
60NM at the chainring but reduced at the rear wheel after gearing.I think the Fazua is 60)
I am not convinced about more range, sure, with a weak motor, you may be forced to put in more energy when climbing than you would if the motor can keep on delivering but the difference in battery consumption would be small, these systems are based on torque sensing.But a less powerful motor will also deliver greater range and that is a big thing with road cyclists.
That's a nice looking bike. I really like the stealthy look, I think this is probably the look manufacturers are going to be aiming for over the next few years. Especially if battery technology keeps improving, ie. ever greater capacity in ever smaller space.
you can connect and external downtube/seat tube battery if you need to extend the 8AH hidden battery. The battery wires are at the top of the downtube, just behind the panel, under the black flap.Especially if battery technology keeps improving, ie. ever greater capacity in ever smaller space.
I'm afraid that it's really just a consequence of the First Law of Thermodynamics (the "energy can neither be created nor destroyed" one). A battery of a given size stores a fixed amount of energy. The faster you put it out, the shorter the battery life. So a very fit rider, putting out lots of power him/herself, will make lower demands on the battery, which should go further.60NM at the chainring but reduced at the rear wheel after gearing.
I am not convinced about more range, sure, with a weak motor, you may be forced to put in more energy when climbing than you would if the motor can keep on delivering but the difference in battery consumption would be small, these systems are based on torque sensing.
There are more and more bikes coming to the market with hidden battery and hidden controller, some go as far as replacing the LCD with Bluetooth.
This is one. The controls and USB socket are hidden under the black flap on the downtube.
http://wooshbikes.co.uk/2018/karoo/karoo-2018.jpg
that is so far true, but given the same route, same rider, the amount of air drag is about the same, the required energy to go from A to B is about the same. For a typical condition of 100kg bike + rider at 15mph, the required energy is about 12WH per mile, if the rider puts in 50% in eco mode, the motor would supply 6WH per mile, 6WH * 15/H = 90W. Even if you have a more capable motor, you don't use more than that 90W.I'm afraid that it's really just a consequence of the First Law of Thermodynamics (the "energy can neither be created nor destroyed" one). A battery of a given size stores a fixed amount of energy. The faster you put it out, the shorter the battery life. So a very fit rider, putting out lots of power him/herself, will make lower demands on the battery, which should go further.
I think we agree. Basically, the more work the motor is doing, the shorter the range for a given battery capacity. Reductio ad Absurdum - turn the motor off and the range is infinite!that is so far true, but given the same route, same rider, the amount of air drag is about the same, the required energy to go from A to B is about the same. For a typical condition of 100kg bike + rider at 15mph, the required energy is about 12WH per mile, if the rider puts in 50% in eco mode, the motor would supply 6WH per mile, 6WH * 15/H = 90W. Even if you have a more capable motor, you don't use more than that 90W.
he is not going to push the motor to the max, so does not consume more.