The reviews that I was referring to were the manufacturers reviews, Orbea and Ribble and the retailers sites. Both of these reviews were not free as they would come from the manufacturers advertising budget which is built into the price of the bike. The other reviews from retailers sites and like manufacturers sites are not free as advertising is paid for by the consumer.
There are some independent reviewers that might be free but a lot of them are also paid for by the number of hits they get.
Even if a review appears to be free it should still be done reasonably well and not be misleading e.g not just lifting blurbs from the manufacturers review.
Manufacturers do not review their own products, they write press releases.
It's a simple fact there are very few genuine, independent, reviews because there is no money in doing them.
Worse, it costs money to do such a review.
As regards a feature/accessory such as a spare battery, all the 'reviewer' can reasonably do is take the press release on trust.
Thus we have the current shambles - the maker says there is a spare battery, but
no one has managed to buy one.