Yes, my experience with gears was the more you went down the gears the slower you got which still means plenty of effort, but with the GTECH it trys to maintain speed, ie up to 15mph and for sure it tackled it with ease, just how expensive is that in terms of battery consumptionReally interested to see how you get on up the hills. Looking at my own bike I can't see a gear that
will comfortably ride at 15-20 mph would get me up most of the hills around here.
However, my wife's cousin (70+) rides a fixed gear. and having seen the tv advert I can see how this could be popular.
And you can't beat a money back guarantee.
Looks like you've grasped the ins and outs, so you can weigh up if a Gtech will suit you.Hi, Thanks for advice and passionate debate on the pro's and cons of the Gtech - Ive been following this thread for a while now and it's interesting how arguments have swung and evolved since the 1st thread was posted.
I have become aware of ebikes only recently - but what really spiked my interest was my neighbor has just bought the Gtech and loves it. This got me thinking/dreaming whist puffing up the hill to Crystal Palace of how nice it would be to enjoy my journey home rather than spend it with a fixed grimace on my face!
I'm in my late forties and in the past would never have considered getting an e-bike as i am to my shame, self-conscious and too aware of the snobbery which exists around them - 'You're fit, why should you need an electric bike - Lazy git!'.
My neighbors Gtech has somewhat changed my opinion on this. This is not to say Im going to immediately ditch my Trek hybrid and spend a grand on a bike that seems to lack any sort of in depth independent review. (Thanks though to Finger and the other chap for interesting and informative opinions)
I feel a little from earlier reactions to posts from some others (notably some with bikes of their own to sell) that they are missing the point of why the Gtech might be attractive to users under 50 who use their bike to commute to work and back (or they get the point but write this off as a fad). This is possibly a huge emerging market. In this market looks will be as important as the spec.
A good point bought up by an early contributor was that once a commuter feels the joy of riding a e-bike they will want to take it further and the Gtech just cant meet that requirement - This has made be think i might wait 12 months and continue puffing up Crystal Palace hill on my Trek - as the way technologies are progression by then Gtech or someone else picking up the baton will create a light, good looking road bike under 1K that can handle those longer journeys.
Thanks to all for an engaging read - and more information on pedelecs on one thread than i'd found on the rest of the net!
You buy it, I'll test it.Everyone just seems so vague about the range?
Do you have to push it up steep hills?
It's not rocket science,fully charge the battery,find a route which has some mix of flat,inclines and say one steep hill. Use the PAS to optimum to suit the climbs,use an average unfit rider.
How far did it go?
I am tempted to get one under the 14 day deal and test it myself,but I am hardly impartial.
KudosDave
Alan,why don't you buy one and test it on the Devon Alps....they offer free delivery and no quibble return,so the cost should be zero.You buy it, I'll test it.
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
I have considered it.Alan,why don't you buy one and test it on the Devon Alps....they offer free delivery and no quibble return,so the cost should be zero.
Your test would be impartial.
KudosDave
They say their claim relates only to use of the lower power setting, but I still doubt it then. In a hilly area I can see that only getting 15 miles at best, using around 12 Wh per mile.On my geared MTB, with road tyres I can get down to 6.2 wh/mile. I cannot imagine getting close to that on a single speed machine, which is what's required to get the quoted 30 miles.
I can only get down to 6.2 wh/m with my controller on low, which is 4A.They say their claim relates only to use of the lower power setting, but I still doubt it then. In a hilly area I can see that only getting 15 miles at best, using around 12 Wh per mile.
12 Wh per mile is the most common consumption across a wide range of e-bikes and circumstances, something we established some while ago.
.
There is already a bike with much better range ( approx. 70 miles) and climbs very well, it has similar styling and some better components. Woosh Karoo.Hi, Thanks for advice and passionate debate on the pro's and cons of the Gtech - Ive been following this thread for a while now and it's interesting how arguments have swung and evolved since the 1st thread was posted.
I have become aware of ebikes only recently - but what really spiked my interest was my neighbor has just bought the Gtech and loves it. This got me thinking/dreaming whist puffing up the hill to Crystal Palace of how nice it would be to enjoy my journey home rather than spend it with a fixed grimace on my face!
I'm in my late forties and in the past would never have considered getting an e-bike as i am to my shame, self-conscious and too aware of the snobbery which exists around them - 'You're fit, why should you need an electric bike - Lazy git!'.
My neighbors Gtech has somewhat changed my opinion on this. This is not to say Im going to immediately ditch my Trek hybrid and spend a grand on a bike that seems to lack any sort of in depth independent review. (Thanks though to Finger and the other chap for interesting and informative opinions)
I feel a little from earlier reactions to posts from some others (notably some with bikes of their own to sell) that they are missing the point of why the Gtech might be attractive to users under 50 who use their bike to commute to work and back (or they get the point but write this off as a fad). This is possibly a huge emerging market. In this market looks will be as important as the spec.
A good point bought up by an early contributor was that once a commuter feels the joy of riding a e-bike they will want to take it further and the Gtech just cant meet that requirement - This has made be think i might wait 12 months and continue puffing up Crystal Palace hill on my Trek - as the way technologies are progression by then Gtech or someone else picking up the baton will create a light, good looking road bike under 1K that can handle those longer journeys.
Thanks to all for an engaging read - and more information on pedelecs on one thread than i'd found on the rest of the net!
Oh, come off it Trex, we know it's you.There is already a bike with much better range ( approx. 70 miles) and climbs very well, it has similar styling and some better components. Woosh Karoo.
Also need to add the retro looking Kudos Stealth road bike .