As it happens I bought a set of them six months ago and I have now stuck them on the Bafang powered bike downtube and on the Argos cheapo bike's motor hub. It is a fraudulent act, which I don't like, but they do now have labels. I stuck the one on the Argos hub two days ago. It isn't a bafang motor and it is vastly less powerful than 250 watts - probably about 160 watts in actual power, but it now has a label.
3x BAFANG 250w 48V/36v BBS02 BBS01 BBSHD Ebike Legal Silver Sticker Decal Motor | eBay
Make your Bafang mid-drive motor power follow the rules of local ebike traffic law. Fit for Bafang 350W/500W/750W/1000W mid motor. EBike Solution Team. If your motor does not identify this, one of these stickers can be used.www.ebay.co.uk
Sorted for less than a fiver.
More Seizures
- Thread starter saneagle
- Start date
They aren't technically compliant. They are being seized because they are technically non-compliant because they don't have a manufacturers label on them.
Are you certain your motor isn't stamped 36V 250W underneath? If not, yet another variation.
The printing on those labels rubs off easily, so I stuck this clear vinyl over mine. Very sticky.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/222555418707?var=521398478275
The law says you have to have the markings on your ebike. It doesn't say who should make the markings, so it's perfectly legal to apply such markings yourself. It would only be fraudulent if the markings had information that you know to be incorrect, like if you put a 250w label on a 500w motor.
Technically they always have been, I've been warning about this for many years.
When a motor is added to a bicycle a motor vehicle has been created which has to be type approved by the manufacturer unless qualifying for exemption (h) in the Two and Three wheeled vehicle Type Approval Regulation 168/2013.
If an individual does it, or creates or imports any unapproved motor vehicle, they must take their creation or import through Single Vehicle Approval by the government's Vehicle Inspectorate at an approved testing station to be classified or exempted.
This latter provision for SVA has been exploited by the DfT and latterly Wisper to allow throttles on EAPCs which then become motor vehicles, but with an informal ministerial permission (MAC) to be used as EAPCs in Great Britain only.
.
It was always going to happen at some time. Self built bikes and modified e-bikes which had always been illegal and still are, had benefitted from an official "blind eye," so long as they conformed to the basic rules of permitted power rating and assist speed and caused no problems.
But now they are causing lots of problems, so the police have stopped using the blind eye and are beginning to enforce the law by prosecution and/or confiscation.
Having a prescribed label might help with some officers, but if a modified machine hasn't been successfully taken through Single Vehicle Approval since, it is illegal and still liable to seizure as the police learn the rules more fully.
.
I have no truck with anybody who is an anti-social fool who causes problems, but it is the problem behaviour that needs to be attacked, not the fact that they were riding on an ebike. There is a tendency among the stupid and fascistic to want to go after anyone with an ebike that is in some trivial pedantic way not quite right. I'm not talking about people on 2kw motorbikes here, but maybe a labelling issue, but otherwise compliant.
Someone in the last day or so was saying these bikes are being used by robbers and hoodlums so they need to be stopped. So lets imagine applying that 'reasoning' to motor cars. We do have big problems of SOME people using motor cars in crime and in anti-social driving. Is the response to start seizing un-connected cars for parking slightly outside a bay, or other trivial matters? Of course not. It would be mad to do that, just as it is to do the same with ebikes that are not being used in a dangerous, criminal, or nuisance causing way
I might be misreading this as saying an EAPC-like SVA'd vehicle can be used as an EAPC. That seems to differ from the DfT's response to HelenJ which was that:
"if you convert a pedal cycle which has already been ridden on the road to “twist and go” operation, it does not become subject to type approval. As previously noted, the regulations will be directed at the manufacturers and so riders making conversions are not committing an offence. Manufacturers are permitted to sell kits of this nature but would need to ensure they are in line with regulations if sold as EAPC kits (EAPC power and speed limits)."
This says clearly that kits, and by implication DIY (non-kit) conversions, must be in line with regulations for EAPCs (outlined by saneagle in ##233) but can have a fully acting (0 to 15.5mph) throttle a.k.a. Twist and Go, and don't need SVA (I take it that in this context of an individual case "type approval" means SVA).
Has this advice from DfT in 2019 been superceded? Does it have the strength to avoid confiscation if the police pick on my DIY build? Where can I refer the police to it?
I'd take the throttle off Anthony if you can manage without it. I know some folks really can't cope without a throttle to get started, so I can't advise them to do that, but if you remove the throttle and can manage, you will be a lot less likely to have a bad outcome if stopped.
I took mine off and chucked it in a box last summer. The only downside for me personally is that I might have to drop a gear or three if I am coming to rest on a hill and might have a hard time getting started again in a high gear. I don't even notice the lack of it now to be honest.
I took mine off and chucked it in a box last summer. The only downside for me personally is that I might have to drop a gear or three if I am coming to rest on a hill and might have a hard time getting started again in a high gear. I don't even notice the lack of it now to be honest.
The DfT have been ducking and diving for years on the EAPC issues, trying to hide the mistakes they've made a number of times.
The advice to HelenJ was clearly wrong, to use an EAPC with a fully acting throttle one must take the bike through SVA ( the single vehicle method of getting type approval). That makes it a motor vehicle in law and not exempt, as Wisper for example accepts as inevitable. But the DfT are willing to still treat it as an EAPC and have instructed the police accordingly, despite it being illegal everywhere else that the EU law applies.
.
I'll be fine with a 4mph throttle but have twice - what is it about roundabouts? - entered, got cramp and crossed bolt rigid at walking pace 
Throttle aside the nice thing about that DfT advice was it saying specifically "the [approval] regulations will be directed at the manufacturers and so riders making conversions are not committing an offence [in not getting approval, if EAPC compliant]" (clarifications mine).
For the sake of builders of kit or DIY fully EAPC conformant 'motor vehicles' has that been restated anywhere else?
Throttle aside the nice thing about that DfT advice was it saying specifically "the [approval] regulations will be directed at the manufacturers and so riders making conversions are not committing an offence [in not getting approval, if EAPC compliant]" (clarifications mine).
For the sake of builders of kit or DIY fully EAPC conformant 'motor vehicles' has that been restated anywhere else?
Last edited:
I'm not convinced by that argument. The Government website lays down clear rules for what makes an ebike exempt from being classed as a motor vehicle. If a kit bike was illegal, they'd say so.
I dont know if this is any help but this is what the Government website states.
www.gov.uk
EAPC standards and legal requirements
I'm shocked my very silly looking bike hasn't been stopped yet, perhaps silliness is it's defence? Far too silly to be a threat to law and order, can't possibly climb hills at 25kp looking like that. Let's say your legal kit pedelec has been seized at a know nothing bozo copper's say so - how would you get it back? Do you wave the receipt and UKCA certification of conformity of your motor at them? Is there some way to force the police to get it independently assessed and returned with a signed confession from the arresting orificer in a photo frame?
Last edited:
Government website advice has long been nonsense, as you well well know.
The basis for kit bike illegality is that no motorised vehicle is legal if not an accepted type or exempted in law. The laws for EAPCs are entirely for manufactured machines, and it is in those laws, such as the 1983 regulation and EN15194, that this and the rules on labelling are set out.
Other than SVA, there is no equivalent law for self produced kit machines to be EAPCs. Basically they don't exist in law, either by type or an exemption, so technically they cannot be legally used on the roads unless taken through Single Vehicle Assessment, to then qualify by Type or be exempted.
Thus it became a "blind eye" subject, ignored for convenience while they caused no bother.
.
That's purely the law though, and that's why it's important to be able to refer the police to any places the Govt have mentioned kits etc. Those may not have legal weight but could reasonably be construed as acceptance and implicit 'instruction' not to confiscate in the case of kit or DIY builds that fully conform to EAPC requirements.
On the brighter side, once we've all done our SVAs we can continue on cycle paths uninsured thanks to MAC, but until then it would still be useful to have the above references to discourage confiscation.
On the brighter side, once we've all done our SVAs we can continue on cycle paths uninsured thanks to MAC, but until then it would still be useful to have the above references to discourage confiscation.
ChatGPT led to what I'm looking for, I hope our legal eagles will agree there's some benefit in it.
A: Govt Guidance including Buying an e-cycle conversion kit (February 2024). States: check that the kit complies with the UK e-cycle regulations and with British or European standards. Links to B. Reference for A.
Although a kit build is legally a motorised vehicle in need of SVA approval/exemption, here the govt refers to a kit build as an e-cycle 'option'. There's no mention of DIY builds.
B: Govt: Riding an electric bike: the rules (undated). Laid out in textual flowchart form as though for a roadside check. States:
When your bike is an EAPC (the usual pedals, power, speed, markings).
If your electric bike does not meet the EAPC rules then it’s classed as a motorcycle or moped.
If your bike is classed as a motorcycle or moped but has not been insured, you may get a fine or your bike may be seized by the police.
Reference for B: https://www.gov.uk/electric-bike-rules
That's the only mention of seizure.
Taken together, to me this makes clear that the govt does not intend the police to seize EAPC conformant kit builds (e.g. if uninsured) but regards them as legitimate e-cycles. I think it's reasonable to maintain a bike using similarly rated replacement parts so a kit build may end up very much like a DIY build.
While that may wash in a roadside check, in the event of an RTA it might leave a loophole for cyclists' insurers.
A: Govt Guidance including Buying an e-cycle conversion kit (February 2024). States: check that the kit complies with the UK e-cycle regulations and with British or European standards. Links to B. Reference for A.
Although a kit build is legally a motorised vehicle in need of SVA approval/exemption, here the govt refers to a kit build as an e-cycle 'option'. There's no mention of DIY builds.
B: Govt: Riding an electric bike: the rules (undated). Laid out in textual flowchart form as though for a roadside check. States:
When your bike is an EAPC (the usual pedals, power, speed, markings).
If your electric bike does not meet the EAPC rules then it’s classed as a motorcycle or moped.
If your bike is classed as a motorcycle or moped but has not been insured, you may get a fine or your bike may be seized by the police.
Reference for B: https://www.gov.uk/electric-bike-rules
That's the only mention of seizure.
Taken together, to me this makes clear that the govt does not intend the police to seize EAPC conformant kit builds (e.g. if uninsured) but regards them as legitimate e-cycles. I think it's reasonable to maintain a bike using similarly rated replacement parts so a kit build may end up very much like a DIY build.
While that may wash in a roadside check, in the event of an RTA it might leave a loophole for cyclists' insurers.
Last edited:
E-bikes targeted in crackdown on 'untouchable' criminals blighting district
"They are being used to commit criminality at all levels"
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
"They are being used to commit criminality at all levels"
E-bikes targeted in crackdown on 'untouchable' criminals blighting district
"They are being used to commit criminality at all levels"
Police warning over e-bikes being ridden in Skegness area
Officers could seize the bike, issue a fixed penalty notice, up to a £200 fine and six penalty points
www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk
Officers could seize the bike, issue a fixed penalty notice, up to a £200 fine and six penalty points
Police warning over e-bikes being ridden in Skegness area
Officers could seize the bike, issue a fixed penalty notice, up to a £200 fine and six penalty points
www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk
E-bike users in Plymouth behaving badly may result in bylaw
"The police inspector responsible for the city centre, Gregg Bridgett, said e-bikes with a power of 250 watts or which travel at 15.5 mph or less are classed as pedal cycles, preventing the police doing much apart from check roadworthiness and documentation.
However, they stopped 15 riders during an enforcement event, seizing seven of them."
www.radioexe.co.uk
E-bike riders could face accreditation rules
An accreditation scheme could be introduced for e-bikes in Plymouth because of concerns about the behaviour of some food delivery riders and other users.
"Insp Gregg Bridgett said Devon and Cornwall Police stopped 15 riders during a recent enforcement event and seized seven of them."
"Scrutiny board members agreed to work with city centre businesses to find out about any responsibilities they had for self-employed delivery drivers, and may consider an accreditation scheme to raise standards."
www.bbc.co.uk
"The police inspector responsible for the city centre, Gregg Bridgett, said e-bikes with a power of 250 watts or which travel at 15.5 mph or less are classed as pedal cycles, preventing the police doing much apart from check roadworthiness and documentation.
However, they stopped 15 riders during an enforcement event, seizing seven of them."
E-bike users in Plymouth behaving badly may result in bylaw
Fast food deliveries could be made to use cycle lanes
www.radioexe.co.uk
An accreditation scheme could be introduced for e-bikes in Plymouth because of concerns about the behaviour of some food delivery riders and other users.
"Insp Gregg Bridgett said Devon and Cornwall Police stopped 15 riders during a recent enforcement event and seized seven of them."
"Scrutiny board members agreed to work with city centre businesses to find out about any responsibilities they had for self-employed delivery drivers, and may consider an accreditation scheme to raise standards."
Plymouth e-bike riders could face accreditation rules
A council committee has concerns over the behaviour of some delivery riders and other users.
www.bbc.co.uk
Related Articles
-
MTF Enterprises announces acquisition of EMU Electric Bikes- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Wisper 806T folding bike wins Which? ‘Best Buy’- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Sustrans calls for protected cycle lanes- Started by: Pedelecs
-
Amazon launch their first UK e-cargo micromobility hub- Started by: Pedelecs
