as an odd aside, i found James May's reaction most dissapointing (trying to justify what Clarkson did), i really liked May and his documentariesThe BBC have just announced at 4pm today 25/3/15 that Jeremy Clarkson's contract will not be renewed so he will not appear on Top Gear again.
It seems from the statement that Clarkson really did go much too far to be forgiven. The police are asking the BBC for their report from the inquiry into his offence.
.
I agree, it was ill judged, though perhaps there was an element of loyalty to a long term colleague since I think May is essentially a very decent person.as an odd aside, i found James May's reaction most dissapointing (trying to justify what Clarkson did), i really liked May and his documentaries
But I think those promoting that trend could be mistaken. Advertisers are very sensitive to certain matters, so not everyone rejected from the BBC is what they want.Allegedly, ITV shares are rising.
it's the BBC that made the three clowns immensely popular.With his money he may set up his own production company and sell to the highest bidder.
Despite all his detractors, he is immensely popular.
in many ways what i found most objectionable was the degree to which it was carefully crafted - the image of "three lads" appealing to the lowest common denominator in viewers (in terms of "humour" as much as anything else)it's the BBC that made the three clowns immensely popular.
And don't forget the work put in by the production team.
You're taking it too seriously. It's a form of escapism, where the three guys are doing and getting away with what a lot of people would like to do. Think about Tom and Jerry, who unfortunately also got banned for being too violent on the TV.in many ways what i found most objectionable was the degree to which it was carefully crafted - the image of "three lads" appealing to the lowest common denominator in viewers (in terms of "humour" as much as anything else)
it's very healthy, i think, that you took it that unseriously. Clarkson evidently doesnt take hismelf so unseriously (nor his chum cameron who described him as a "serious talent"). we live in a country and eu where populist right wing rhetoric are escalating and there's w orld difference to me between clarkson's deliberate increasing use of rascism and whatever tom and jerry got up to.You're taking it too seriously. It's a form of escapism, where the three guys are doing and getting away with what a lot of people would like to do. Think about Tom and Jerry, who unfortunately also got banned for being too violent on the TV.
however, how about replacing him with neil AND christine hamilton from UKIP, and giving them free range to spew anything they want?You're taking it too seriously. It's a form of escapism, where the three guys are doing and getting away with what a lot of people would like to do. Think about Tom and Jerry, who unfortunately also got banned for being too violent on the TV.
it's the BBC that made the three clowns immensely popular.
And don't forget the work put in by the production team.
OK. I was brought up in an era when teachers whacked the kids when they answered back and we were taught to read with "Little Black Sambo" and we used to collect the golliwog s on the Robinson's jam jars. I guess I'll have to start singing "Bah Bah Rainbow Sheep" with the rest of you.
Can we start a petition to bring back Tom and Jerry? No? Oh well, Bah bah rainbow sheep, have you any wool? Yes sir............[/quote
this isnt about political correctness - it's about ethics. ethics is very simple - its about treating others the way one wants to be treated. If the producer hit clarkson he would have been fired, immediately. It's a lot easier to find racist language acceptable if one may has not been on the receiving end of actual discrimination (which is a reality, in contemporary uk).