Mark doesn't appear to have noticed.Sorry my attempt at returning humour missed mark on way back.
.
Mark doesn't appear to have noticed.Sorry my attempt at returning humour missed mark on way back.
He's a bit short sightedMark doesn't appear to have noticed.
.
There is concrete wall then there is concrete wall... Concrete from the 1920s is some parts of the world is impenetrable by radio waves, I tried. That house was therefore cabled with cat 5 and you had to go to the window to use the phone. The clay the Romans used to make the bricks in the southwest of France has quite a bit of iron sands in it with the results you can imagine. Here I am sitting in a wooden house from 1870s and I can connect my WiFi box from the bar three floors down.my unifi disc goes through 2 concrete walls and a floor for the kodi box in the front room and streams films with no problems on the wifi even with all the other devices on it as well.
ubiquiti is enterprise class hardware and can be scaled to one disc or hundreds if you live in a castle
the software has been updated now tho but still works the same way
... And these work very well provided you only use 2 or 3 of them. A Master and 2 or 3 slaves. Once the number rises above 4 , depending on the brand and the software revision they can or might exhibit problems. Some can handle 4 and some 16 nodesI used a Homeplug (LAN over electric sockets) for running my computer upstairs with router downstairs.
Worked a treat and never had any problems with it.
... I'll agree with the each to his own. After that we must part company.Just caught the tail end of this conversation. In my experience there's no doubt that currently, the likes of cat6 cabling is better than wifi, in terms of being able to carry 4k etc etc. However, so is a Linn sondek turntable connected via a flagship amp to B&W speakers, in terms of sound. The compromise with all of this is of course a lot more cables and complexity etc etc.
I've completely changed the set up of my home systems, de-cluttering hardware, getting rid of all the cables and selling dvd's and cd's etc. I'm now 50 yrs old, eye's not as good nor hearing so the real detail in picture quality / sound is not something I notice as much.
I have the 200mb Virgin broadband. Bearing in mind I have 5 people in house of which three are teenagers and always on internet. This allows me to have one master point on wall with wifi router connected to all devices and without issues. Most people seem to think you can have 20 wifi items connects to a 2mb wifi, really!.
Whether we like it or not, even cat6e cabling will become a thing of the past in years to come as the direction is towards simple / easy wireless systems. I use the word easy wireless with caution!.
My system involves TV, Projector, Sonos speakers through house, NAS drive (storing all movies, music etc), NEST and LIFX lights. All can be managed from any point in the house using iphone. I don't need an wifi extender, but there are plenty of good ones out there.
In summary, and IMHO wireless is easy to install and move, gets rid of all those cables and allows ease of use / flexibility.
Each to their own.
I can't answer for those who listen to pop music, but I can for my classical listening. No matter how expensive the equipment, what I hear from CDs bears little resemblance to what I hear live in concert halls of all sizes from orchestral, ensemble and solo performances. Vinyl reproduction is very much closer and importantly presents a spatial sound stage that no CD has ever got near to in my experience.1. The revival of vinyl records has constantly puzzled me. Why anyone would want to return it a world of rumble, tracking errors , hum, wow and flutter , limited dynamic range, limited stereo separation, limited duration defeats me. The argument touted that there is a wider frequency response than CD is potentially correct but practically irrelevant and CDs could have any frequency range desired. You can record video on CD if desired. There was a TV programme in the 1980 s about computer gaming i think called " bad influence" and there was a technical section in it each week. The compere. Referred to his audience as "techifurtlers" and that is the image I bring to mind when i read of the thousands of pounds spent on trying to get a disc rotating at a fixed speed and get a tiny diamond stylus to vibrate.
The same for me.I found in my case that cat6 cabling gave and continues to give the most reliable performance.
Done it all, using BC1 monitors which I prefer for my listening, but have also tried very expensive active monitors.decent 3 way monitors/speakers cost mega bucks and then you need expensive ad da converters for the best result if there active monitors.
The best quality music i ever heard played was on vinyl, full of life!!!!!. CD and digital is very clinical. Ask any true audiophile over say 40yrs of age and he / she will agree.... I'll agree with the each to his own. After that we must part company.
1. The revival of vinyl records has constantly puzzled me. Why anyone would want to return it a world of rumble, tracking errors , hum, wow and flutter , limited dynamic range, limited stereo separation, limited duration defeats me. The argument touted that there is a wider frequency response than CD is potentially correct but practically irrelevant and CDs could have any frequency range desired. You can record video on CD if desired. There was a TV programme in the 1980 s about computer gaming i think called " bad influence" and there was a technical section in it each week. The compere. Referred to his audience as "techifurtlers" and that is the image I bring to mind when i read of the thousands of pounds spent on trying to get a disc rotating at a fixed speed and get a tiny diamond stylus to vibrate.
2. The geometry of a specific house will dictate whether WiFi is suitable. The practice of using aluminium backed polyurethane foam insulation in walls can play havoc as can thick concrete or rubble walls. In my earlier post I indicated difficulties in these areas and how the different plug in internet adaptors, sometimes got confused. I found in my case that cat6 cabling gave and continues to give the most reliable performance.
In a future there is a proposal to use modulation on the output of led lamps, including those in the ceiling rose to transmit data at high data rates. So we might converge in a future where the data transmission is wireless and optical
Beautifully put and totally agree!I can't answer for those who listen to pop music, but I can for my classical listening. No matter how expensive the equipment, what I hear from CDs bears little resemblance to what I hear live in concert halls of all sizes from orchestral, ensemble and solo performances. Vinyl reproduction is very much closer and importantly presents a spatial sound stage that no CD has ever got near to in my experience.
Much of this aural superiority of vinyl is due to the intrinsic errors of extracting the information from the groove, the sum of the errors approximating all the acoustical errors of listening venues.. But that doesn't matter, hearing music isnt a technical data reading experience, it's an emotional one.
The same for me.
.