I dont really see the point of this thread. Saying someone should go for excessively more power just because they want slightly more power over the legal limit doesn't make sense.
I drive my car and motorcycle slightly over the speed limit sometimes, like most people do, but that doesn't mean i would drive 30/40/50 mph over whatever the limit is, it would be reckless.
I think the legal 15.5 mph is too slow on the road, so i'm prepared to take that to around 20mph for my next kit. Its still illegal but i dont consider it reckless so i dont really care that its not legal.
As for the no throttle law, well i have no respect for that law, so i will carry on fitting throttles.
For me personally its all about being sensible about how much extra power you want and when & where to use that extra power, dont take the **** and its unlikely to cause yourself or anyone else a problem.
If some people want even more power than me, well its their choice, i'm not going to dictate to anyone else what they should do.
I placed this thread because if you read the current crop of 'which bike should I buy' ,in response to hill climbing without pedalling,more speed,more power....and that is a common theme running through this forum,that is not the norm when selling pedelecs to the populace,it is unique to this forum.
Mostly they get told they need an S-class with a dongle or a BBS with 500 watts or 48v x30 amps.....my point is that all the forum responses are that the only solution to these people's wishes is to go illegal.
But there doesn't seem to be a volume produced illegal bike that from the box does what these people want....the minute you add a dongle or up the amps you make the bike illegal so why not go the whole hog and build a powerful bike that will do all these things,without the hassle of a kit or dongle.
I suspect that people feel less guilty if they buy a bike that they consider is 'only a little bit illegal'....but there are not degrees of illegality,there are no grey areas,it is either legal or illegal....but would you sign a disclaimer stating that the bike is for 'private land use only,with the land owners permission and is not registered for UK cycle use?
I remember one of the S-class sellers stating that the bike he was selling was only 'slightly illegal and who cares anyway'. I actually think that if I built a batch of 1kw x 30 mph e-bikes the demand would be minimal because I am being too honest about the illegality,it leaves no margin for innocence of the law.......Really officer my super fast e-bike is illegal,I didn't know that,the dealer told me it was ok,hehe !!!!!!!
Therein lies the difference,how many forum members would buy an illegal bike,say to S-class spec if they were compelled to sign a disclaimer knowing that it is illegal to ride on UK roads or tracks. How many people would buy a German S-class bike from a UK dealer or get a UK dealer to fit a dongle knowing that it is illegal but not asked to sign such a disclaimer. I suspect the latter would outsell the former 10:1 but the reality of responsibility on the owner is the same,innocence is blind!
The recent events about hoverboards is an indicator of what could happen....the spate of fires and the sad death of the 15 year old riding one has pretty much destroyed the market for this device....the police have been told to have a vendetta to get them off the road or pavement,they are illegal,Amazon and Tesco have recalled them.....at the recent NEC cycle show the Chinese guys next to me were selling lots,I wonder how many are in arguments over returning them,now they are of no use?
KudosDave