Sometimes people just spam their needs and then disappear for a good time. If the OP has been back since, then he could have had the decency to click any one of the topic response buttons. I'm sure that there must be something in the many responses that he likes, dislikes, agrees with, finds useful or informative. Or maybe, @crazymaster , he's just shy.
in my defense, again. read my first reply to the OP. This was before you jumped in. What about this post was a hijack? I was a asking a question and making a helpful suggestion. There was no judgement, no lecture, and certainly no deviation...just a suggestion and question.
We're a very naughty lot in here Ryan, no thread is considered complete until it's been hijacked at least once.
This is one of our strengths, we are like a pub, just chatting and naturally the conversations meander in different directions.
That’s fair enough, it’s natural for a conversation to ebb and flow, but surely there is a line when it becomes rude to the OP? Especially when the ‘hyjacker’ has no intention of answering their question or helping them in any way.
Don’t act naive, it just comes across as childish. Your comment was as transparent as it was repetitive - which was part of the reason I interjected. You’ve even admitted it was loaded. The other part being the fake account set up to slander the other company in that thread from a few years ago, which to me is far more sickening than anyone risking their own licence on an illegal vehicle.
Hahaha and I won’t stop until everyone acknowledges that if the law isn’t going to deter someone neither is the disapproval of a mid range ebike company
I’m not really sure what you’re implying here mike.
You're on the losing side in this issue. The great majority in this forum are opposed to derestriction and many of us post warnings about the illegality when someone mentions getting higher speeds.
That would be very irresponsible in the Electric Bicycles Forum and also an abuse of this website as this heading shows:
