The Bafang BBS01/02 use helical gears too, hence their quietness. The BBS01 is apparently 80Nm torque, so not quite up to the Brose but quite a bit more than Bosch and even Yamaha.
Edit: the Panasonic doesn't look like it's using epicyclic gearing, and nor does the BBS01. Interesting to see it on a crank drive courtesy of Brose, and I imagine it has significantly less wear as it is using 3 planetary gears rather than a single gear.
Quite true, epicyclics are much better at dealing with loads because among other reasons they are self-aligning so loads are split evenly between the three, so they can be
smaller for given load.
If you then add the helical tooth aspect it further increases ability to withstand loads without fatal tooth bend/distortion because tooth to tooth contact area is increased dramatically 'cos at least three teeth on each of the three planets are involved in transferring load at any given point in time (and space!) which means the whole drive unit
can be smaller still. In simple cheaper spur gear set ups its often left to just one poor 'ole tooth, so it has to be massive to stand a chance of survival.
This is not rocket science and the chances are that very capable Yamaha and Bosch designers had pitched similarly eloquent designs to their masters ...but the masters (read: bean-counters) won. Not much comfort to Haibike owners but at least the Bosch designers can have a quiet
"told-you-so" moment when they next meet the accountants, who have at long last accepted responsibility for their errors.