Actually mopeds and some motorcycles are restricted to certain power output and licencing restrictions, as for registration/tax/mot on its way that will be down to idiots like this and all the other fools who think it is ok to use dongles etc and de-restrict their bikes and openly brag about it.It’s funny how this is getting so much attention isn’t it?
If one cast ones attention to cars we all drive motor cars/motorcycle which can exceed the speed limit? Not one has a limited at 70MPH do they?
Registration/tax/mot all on its way for us all.
Remember follow the money which one usually arrives at the answer why?
Road pricing is the likely way forward, especially when Internal combustion engines are no longer the majority form of propulsion. Governments will no longer receive petrol tax & will not want to restrict the take up of electric motors by taxing them, so a road usage tax will be proposed as the fairest solution. ICE users will face a double tax to incentivise then to switch & the government retains a lucrative revenue steam.Actually mopeds and some motorcycles are restricted to certain power output and licencing restrictions, as for registration/tax/mot on its way that will be down to idiots like this and all the other fools who think it is ok to use dongles etc and de-restrict their bikes and openly brag about it.
I've disagreed since you've grasped the wrong end of the stick.It’s funny how this is getting so much attention isn’t it?
If one cast ones attention to cars we all drive motor cars/motorcycle which can exceed the speed limit? Not one has a limited at 70MPH do they?
Registration/tax/mot all on its way for us all.
Remember follow the money which one usually arrives at the answer why?
I think there are many more people sticking to the 20mph limit in areas where there are many pedestrians than there are sticking to the 70mph limit on motorways, I certainly do.If one cast ones attention to cars we all drive motor cars/motorcycle which can exceed the speed limit? Not one has a limited at 70MPH do they?
We already have similar in London, the £11.50 a day congestion charge zone for cars (but free for electric ones at present) and the additional £12.50 a day for the more polluting of the ic cars in an ever expanding low pollution zone. £24 a day really is mind concentrating taxation!Road pricing is the likely way forward, especially when Internal combustion engines are no longer the majority form of propulsion. Governments will no longer receive petrol tax & will not want to restrict the take up of electric motors by taxing them, so a road usage tax will be proposed as the fairest solution. ICE users will face a double tax to incentivise then to switch & the government retains a lucrative revenue steam.
I must admit I was only thinking about electric cars - I forgot about pedelecs as a source of taxation - too small in numbers (at present!)We already have similar in London, the £11.50 a day congestion charge zone for cars (but free for electric ones at present) and the additional £12.50 a day for the more polluting of the ic cars in an ever expanding low pollution zone. £24 a day really is mind concentrating taxation!
However I disagree on pedelecs, London and national policy is to encourage their free use to discourage car driving, so I see no prospect ever of charging them or bicycles in any way.
.
They'll never be taxed now.I forgot about pedelecs as a source of taxation - too small in numbers (at present!)
I totally agree with you. 20 mph is usually for an extra special reason. When driving in places like this I think to myself “ my grandchildren could be playing near this road”.I think there are many more people sticking to the 20mph limit in areas where there are many pedestrians than there are sticking to the 70mph limit on motorways, I certainly do.
I think it's reasonable to criticise those exceeding 20mph limits when there are many pedestrians around but not be critical of those exceeding the 70mph limits.
This is one of the things I love my Nissan Leaf for. Its electric drive with no gears enables incredibly precise control at any speed. Even at ultra slow speeds below clutch slipping level in first gear it can be perfectly maintained at any exact speed with ease.Having said that though, on my last trip to Spain a large area of the town had a speed limit of 20kph. This was quite difficult not to exceed and necessitated looking at the speedometer as much as the road.
Everywhere in France there are 30kph (18.75mph) limits near schools but increasingly smaller villages now have the 30kph limit throughout.I totally agree with you. 20 mph is usually for an extra special reason. When driving in places like this I think to myself “ my grandchildren could be playing near this road”.
Having said that though, on my last trip to Spain a large area of the town had a speed limit of 20kph. This was quite difficult not to exceed and necessitated looking at the speedometer as much as the road.
Keeping to speed limits (esp 20 and 30mph) is our main use of cruise control; even as a careful (I try/hope) driver, without it it is just so easy to nudge above the limit, and then a bit more, and ... It seems quite rare the 'open' road is open enough for sensible use of cruise control.This was quite difficult not to exceed and necessitated looking at the speedometer as much as the road.
Indeed. On motoring fora I have seen plenty of people with cruise control say they never use it and don't see the point, or that they only use it on the motorway to keep at the speed of the car in front (radar cruise control) or stay at a constant speed. Yet one of its most useful features is the ability to stay accurately within the speed limit without constantly looking at the speedo in 30 or 40 limit areas. The only anomaly is that at least in my car it doesn't come on below 25mph so is of no practical benefit in 20 zones which are becoming commonplace across our cities (and I think rightly so for the safety of cyclists and pedestrians).Keeping to speed limits (esp 20 and 30mph) is our main use of cruise control; even as a careful (I try/hope) driver, without it it is just so easy to nudge above the limit, and then a bit more, and ... It seems quite rare the 'open' road is open enough for sensible use of cruise control.
Much depends on traffic density though. My cruise control can operate from 20 mph and my South London Borough, one of London's largest, has a blanket 20 mph limit on all but the through routes. Yet my cruise control is of no use, simply because the traffic density and road conditions mean speed is constantly varying from slow walking pace up to 30 and briefly 40 mph infrequently.On motoring fora I have seen plenty of people with cruise control say they never use it - - - - - Yet one of its most useful features is the ability to stay accurately within the speed limit without constantly looking at the speedo in 30 or 40 limit areas.
I find speed limiters to be rather restrictive because I appreciate the ability to accelerate quickly to avoid danger should the (very seldom) need arise, they've been around for decades.My car came with a speed limiter as do many new models, no doubt getting ready for mandatory use in the near future.
https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/mandatory-speed-limiters/
I find it much more useful than cruise control particularly for the 20 mph limits.
Dave.