Note that the Turnigy Accucel-6 is factory-configured at 19.8V for 6S (3.3V per cell) which is the nominal A123 voltage, not the rated charge voltage (3.6V).
3.6V *nominal* is often quoted for Li-ion cells (unlike 3.6V *charge* for A123).
LiPo chargers use 4.2V per cell, thus (I guess) the 25.2V figure quoted in your previous post.
Dan
3.6V *nominal* is often quoted for Li-ion cells (unlike 3.6V *charge* for A123).
LiPo chargers use 4.2V per cell, thus (I guess) the 25.2V figure quoted in your previous post.
Dan
On my Turnigy Accucel, A123 cells in 6S configuration charge until 21.6V is reached (3.6V per cell).
The first charging phase is Constant Current (CC) - in my case 1.8A - during which my cheap 12V charger sees approximately a -1V voltage drop, at 19.8V constant output from the Accucel. That's theoretically 19.8*1.8=35.64W (not accounting for any loss), so that's about 3A draw from my cheap chinese charger which is rated 5A. Safe margin
The following Constant Voltage (CV) phase doesn't require much (if any at all) current, so the 12V charger sees no voltage drop. This is when balancing occurs, at approximately 20.6A => note that this figure varies, as the capacity is distributed amongst cells until 3.6V is reached for each cell...or in my case never (because I need to cycle my cells a bit more for the proper balance to be achieved)
I guess the figure you quoted (25.2V) applies to LiPo, not nanophosphate technology (LiFePO4 et al.), right?
Cheers, Dan