Someone should remind Liz and Kwasi that Putin also went for growth.Her and Coat-hanger are a pair of fools. They even have the physical appearance of people who retarded.
Georgia, Crimea, Ukraine.
Look how that went.
.
Someone should remind Liz and Kwasi that Putin also went for growth.Her and Coat-hanger are a pair of fools. They even have the physical appearance of people who retarded.
Ironically heard truss on radio this am finally breaking cover - and blaming putin for the budget fiasco. A lot like Chris whatsisname (second in command at treasury and a visibly shaken, bug eye staring bloke who seem every bit as competent as kwasi) on telly last night. The problem - if I park all my anti conservative bias - is that the tories are in a terrible bind. Truss cannot change direction without losing all "credibility" and they cannot afford another leadership election. Were in a suicide pact.Someone should remind Liz and Kwasi that Putin also went for growth.
Georgia, Crimea, Ukraine.
Look how that went.
.
That's Chris Philp, MP for Croydon South, adjacent to my ward, a prize twerp.A lot like Chris whatsisname (second in command at treasury and a visibly shaken, bug eye staring bloke who seem every bit as competent as kwasi) on telly last night.
As you posted, she can't can't back down now. She will have to be removed from office.I saw LT on TV this morning. Still defiant.
Ironic (yes, intentional backward reference) - I really don't believe it is their womanhood per se which has been the problem. But them as individuals.As you posted, she can't can't back down now. She will have to be removed from office.
Tory woman PM number 3.
Thatcher, May, Truss, TMT. More like TNT.
Will they dare go for a number 4?
.
Common to all three, a stubborn refusal to change mind, no matter how obviously that is necessary.Ironic (yes, intentional backward reference) - I really don't believe it is their womanhood per se which has been the problem. But them as individuals.
It might be somewhat more characteristic of a woman who has had to (chosen to - it's not compulsory) go through the political career path. With all that entails.Common to all three, a stubborn refusal to change mind, no matter how obviously that is necessary.
Controversial I know, but in my experience more a female characteristic.
Men will change their mind and then pretend they knew the right course all along.
.
Maybe, but I've never personally known any women politicians so can't begin to judge that.It might be somewhat more characteristic of a woman who has had to (chosen to - it's not compulsory) go through the political career path. With all that entails.
Time for Charlie Boy to step in and make a hero of himself by dissolving parliamentIronically heard truss on radio this am finally breaking cover - and blaming putin for the budget fiasco. A lot like Chris whatsisname (second in command at treasury and a visibly shaken, bug eye staring bloke who seem every bit as competent as kwasi) on telly last night. The problem - if I park all my anti conservative bias - is that the tories are in a terrible bind. Truss cannot change direction without losing all "credibility" and they cannot afford another leadership election. Were in a suicide pact.
He can't do it any more. That right of the Crown had been in doubt since an act in 2011, and the prorogue by Queen Elizabeth II in 2019 upon the advice of Boris Johnson was later ruled to be unlawful.Time for Charlie Boy to step in and make a hero of himself by dissolving parliament
the pound will settle when we have demonstrated fiscal responsibility, no unfunded spending, especially on buying votes.I wonder if the pound will settle, after a period of hedge fund/other automatic short selling tactics cease to provide a reasonable return? Reagan didn't have to worry about that nearly as much, way back when, and they are following Reagan's playbook not Thatcher's - growth via the countries' credit card, inflation be damned and the central bank's problem. Expect ruthless shrinking of the state next.
Here's to hoping not too many of them are shorting UK plcHe can't do it any more. That right of the Crown had been in doubt since an act in 2011, and the prorogue by Queen Elizabeth II in 2019 upon the advice of Boris Johnson was later ruled to be unlawful.
The No Confidence vote is now the only possibility, under the control of the 1922 committee currently.
.
Technically, a vote of confidence is under the control of 1922. But a vote of no confidence can be initiated by the opposition (or, I believe, theoretically by any other party).He can't do it any more. That right of the Crown had been in doubt since an act in 2011, and the prorogue by Queen Elizabeth II in 2019 upon the advice of Boris Johnson was later ruled to be unlawful.
The No Confidence vote is now the only possibility, under the control of the 1922 committee currently.
.
I guess unlike America under Reagan we have very low unemployment in a relatively low skilled menial way in an economy that has for so long been about money laundering that it lost the infrastructure to grow around. And we have conservatives who would rather cut tax for offshore multinationals and wealthy individuals than tax and invest in the economy (as starmer propose with great British energy). Conservative politics since Thatcher via brexit have well and truly ******, rogered, annihilated the British economyI wonder if the pound will settle, after a period of hedge fund/other automatic short selling tactics cease to provide a reasonable return? Reagan didn't have to worry about that nearly as much, way back when, and they are following Reagan's playbook not Thatcher's - growth via the countries' credit card, inflation be damned and the central bank's problem. Expect ruthless shrinking of the state next.
Whatever actually happens, the attitude and incompetence shown by LT and KK has fatally undermined them. And this morning's local radio interviews didn't help.I wonder if the pound will settle, after a period of hedge fund/other automatic short selling tactics cease to provide a reasonable return? Reagan didn't have to worry about that nearly as much, way back when, and they are following Reagan's playbook not Thatcher's - growth via the countries' credit card, inflation be damned and the central bank's problem. Expect ruthless shrinking of the state next.
Of course, but as I posted, currently under the control of the 1922 committee. In two ways:Technically, a vote of confidence is under the control of 1922. But a vote of no confidence can be initiated by the opposition (or, I believe, theoretically by any other party).
(British Constitution according to Wiki. )