Zlatan will never learn not to make What he regards as sly little digs,and everybody else thinks so bloody childish.Singular? Surely not.
This is too tempting are you asking for someone else to be added as well as yourself,zlatan?
Zlatan will never learn not to make What he regards as sly little digs,and everybody else thinks so bloody childish.Singular? Surely not.
Perhaps childish digs but you, ve just proven him correct.Zlatan will never learn not to make What he regards as sly little digs,and everybody else thinks so bloody childish.
This is too tempting are you asking for someone else to be added as well as yourself,zlatan?
I don't need to argue about the vaccines potential failure, as vaccines they're rather unsuccessful and sometimes even on the verge of failure, and that is before we even know how long their limited protection lasts.reading your posts (only a bit between lines) seems to suggest folk think the vaccine will work. If that's the case why point out, argue about who is responsible for its potential failure.
Well informed, well written post.I don't need to argue about the vaccines potential failure, as vaccines they're rather unsuccessful and sometimes even on the verge of failure, and that is before we even know how long their limited protection lasts.
The function of a vaccine is to prevent one getting the targeted disease and we've has some highly successful ones, the best being the Smallpox vaccine which has totally eliminated that terrible disease. There are a number of other highly successful ones in the active, inactive and sub-unit groups, chiefly those against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Polio, Tetanus, Diptheria, Pertussis (Whooping Cough) and Influenza.
Unfortunately the vaccines we have against Covid-19 cannot prevent us from contracting the disease in anything like all cases. They do however limit the ill effects of the disease when we do catch it, though for how long we don't know. The benefits so far we are told, as well as some degree of prevention of catching Covid, are a large reduction in the need for hospitalisation and a reduction in the transmissibility of the virus. Both are very useful and valid reasons why we should all be innoculated for everyone's sake.
But as vaccines against contracting Covid-19, with efficacy levels in the way they are being applied from as low as 54% at times, they are too often unsatisfactory, as shown by other vaccines with efficacy rates from 50% to somewhat over 60% being officially termed failures. One of the approved Covid vaccines only averages 66% protection against contracting the the disease and the claims of others for 95% or even 100% protection are only for some in certain circumstances. So even calling them vaccines in the accepted meaning of the word is ambitious. Quote:
"Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, rather than treat a disease once you have caught it."
But of course the Covid-19 vaccines in many instances are treating, having insufficiently prevented, so are best regarded as antigens**, highly desirable precautionary medicines rather than highly effective vaccines, ensuring if the disease is caught that the ill effects for the victim and others are minimised, albeit for a yet unknown period.
Fortunately the makers are well aware of their limitations and are already promising forthcoming boosters and/or replacements, so hopefully they'll substantially improve given time and may one day better qualify as highly effective vaccines.
Of course one way we can already improve the disease prevention performance of the vaccines is to get the full dosage into arms at the fastest recommended interval instead of continuing the delaying, or simply use them as single dose vaccines.
** An antigen boosts the immune system against a specific disease, especially promoting the production of antibodies.
.
A little bit judgemental don't you think? and who precisely have I been insulting?Perhaps childish digs but you, ve just proven him correct.
And, for what it's worth, I, ve watched in here since leaving. You do insult continually, he has stopped responding specifically but you continue. ( look at your last response to him suggesting word should be echoes instead of echo) he didn't even mention your name, but you take the insult. Guilty conscience perhaps?) You should both grow up.
The tone in here is appalling, from yourself, Polly, Zlatan, JHC and especially Jonathon Agnew. It's putting me off the entire Forum.
100% BULL CRAPI don't need to argue about the vaccines potential failure, as vaccines they're rather unsuccessful and sometimes even on the verge of failure, and that is before we even know how long their limited protection lasts.
The function of a vaccine is to prevent one getting the targeted disease and we've has some highly successful ones, the best being the Smallpox vaccine which has totally eliminated that terrible disease. There are a number of other highly successful ones in the active, inactive and sub-unit groups, chiefly those against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Polio, Tetanus, Diptheria, Pertussis (Whooping Cough) and Influenza.
Unfortunately the vaccines we have against Covid-19 cannot prevent us from contracting the disease in anything like all cases. They do however limit the ill effects of the disease when we do catch it, though for how long we don't know. The benefits so far we are told, as well as some degree of prevention of catching Covid, are a large reduction in the need for hospitalisation and a reduction in the transmissibility of the virus. Both are very useful and valid reasons why we should all be innoculated for everyone's sake.
But as vaccines against contracting Covid-19, with efficacy levels in the way they are being applied from as low as 54% at times, they are too often unsatisfactory, as shown by other vaccines with efficacy rates from 50% to somewhat over 60% being officially termed failures. One of the approved Covid vaccines only averages 66% protection against contracting the the disease and the claims of others for 95% or even 100% protection are only for some in certain circumstances. So even calling them vaccines in the accepted meaning of the word is ambitious. Quote:
"Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, rather than treat a disease once you have caught it."
But of course the Covid-19 vaccines in many instances are treating, having insufficiently prevented, so are best regarded as antigens**, highly desirable precautionary medicines rather than highly effective vaccines, ensuring if the disease is caught that the ill effects for the victim and others are minimised, albeit for a yet unknown period.
Fortunately the makers are well aware of their limitations and are already promising forthcoming boosters and/or replacements, so hopefully they'll substantially improve given time and may one day better qualify as highly effective vaccines.
Of course one way we can already improve the disease prevention performance of the vaccines is to get the full dosage into arms at the fastest recommended interval instead of continuing the delaying, or simply use them as single dose vaccines.
** An antigen boosts the immune system against a specific disease, especially promoting the production of antibodies.
.
Smallpox vaccine is 100% BULL CRAPI don't need to argue about the vaccines potential failure, as vaccines they're rather unsuccessful and sometimes even on the verge of failure, and that is before we even know how long their limited protection lasts.
The function of a vaccine is to prevent one getting the targeted disease and we've had some highly successful ones, the best being the Smallpox vaccine which has totally eliminated that terrible disease. There are a number of other highly successful ones in the active, inactive and sub-unit groups, chiefly those against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Polio, Tetanus, Diptheria, Pertussis (Whooping Cough) and Influenza.
Unfortunately the vaccines we have against Covid-19 cannot prevent us from contracting the disease in anything like all cases. They do however limit the ill effects of the disease when we do catch it, though for how long we don't know. The benefits so far we are told, as well as some degree of prevention of catching Covid, are a large reduction in the need for hospitalisation and a reduction in the transmissibility of the virus. Both are very useful and valid reasons why we should all be innoculated for everyone's sake.
But as vaccines against contracting Covid-19, with efficacy levels in the way they are being applied from as low as 54% at times, they are too often unsatisfactory, as shown by other vaccines with efficacy rates from 50% to somewhat over 60% being officially termed failures. One of the approved Covid vaccines only averages 66% protection against contracting the the disease and the claims of others for 95% or even 100% protection are only for some in certain circumstances. So even calling them vaccines in the accepted meaning of the word is ambitious. Quote:
"Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, rather than treat a disease once you have caught it."
But of course the Covid-19 vaccines in many instances are treating, having insufficiently prevented, so are best regarded as antigens**, highly desirable precautionary medicines rather than highly effective vaccines, ensuring if the disease is caught that the ill effects for the victim and others are minimised, albeit for a yet unknown period.
Fortunately the makers are well aware of their limitations and are already promising forthcoming boosters and/or replacements, so hopefully they'll substantially improve given time and may one day better qualify as highly effective vaccines.
Of course one way we can already improve the disease prevention performance of the vaccines is to get the full dosage into arms at the fastest recommended interval instead of continuing the delaying, or simply use them as single dose vaccines.
** An antigen boosts the immune system against a specific disease, especially promoting the production of antibodies.
.
For once you have actually got something roughly right, since there is no smallpox vaccination program anywhere in the world, so as a vaccine in use it doesn't exist.Smallpox vaccine is 100% BULL CRAP
Smallpox vaccine is 100% BULL CRAP]
Are we to assume you don't like Vaccines?
Did you ball locks.....I had a boss like you.....never admit a mistake.Yes i noticed,
Baron David Frost has a reputation of a tough negotiator to defend.Clearly this government stooge has been sent there to prevent any agreement being reached
You certainly do... And you will be left carrying them, now that the game has changed to Chinese Chequers. What I see panning out is that the EU will let the unilateral UK breach to NI continue , unless they see flagrant breaches and stuff appearing in France. Meanwhile the EU Parliament will not get around to rejecting the Trade Agreement, and the EU Court will issue a reprimand to the UK.Baron David Frost has a reputation of a tough negotiator to defend.
I think he still believes we hold all the cards.
What have I said that’s so offensive? I’m known as Mr tact & diplomacy.Perhaps childish digs but you, ve just proven him correct.
And, for what it's worth, I, ve watched in here since leaving. You do insult continually, he has stopped responding specifically but you continue. ( look at your last response to him suggesting word should be echoes instead of echo) he didn't even mention your name, but you take the insult. Guilty conscience perhaps?) You should both grow up.
The tone in here is appalling, from yourself, Polly, Zlatan, JHC and especially Jonathon Agnew. It's putting me off the entire Forum.
Paradoxically I agree with you. And apologies for assuming you voted for brexit/boris before. You seemed a dead ringer for a female alias of another brexit voter on here (and god knows, we have our share of conservative female impersonators). However, it was an assumption, so apologies. However, it's an ideal world in which we dont insult each other. I'm afraid back in the real world were all a lot like the royal family ( if one pick ever so slightly at the quite flaky surface it's all tribal and rage in the underbelly)Perhaps childish digs but you, ve just proven him correct.
And, for what it's worth, I, ve watched in here since leaving. You do insult continually, he has stopped responding specifically but you continue. ( look at your last response to him suggesting word should be echoes instead of echo) he didn't even mention your name, but you take the insult. Guilty conscience perhaps?) You should both grow up.
The tone in here is appalling, from yourself, Polly, Zlatan, JHC and especially Jonathon Agnew. It's putting me off the entire Forum.
You're right of course, but it was funDid you ball locks.....I had a boss like you.....never admit a mistake.
Tough negotiator?Baron David Frost has a reputation of a tough negotiator to defend.
I think he still believes we hold all the cards.