So this post is an example of being on topic?
actually it isn't is it? the intent is to create futher argument
And do look up the meaning of Spamming
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
actually it isn't is it? the intent is to create futher argument
And do look up the meaning of Spamming
Labour can't win outright at the next GE.
SNP and LibDems MPs should keep JC and J. McDonnell from excesses.
TBH, McDonnell is becoming pretty much new Labour to me.
But on the other hand, neither did you.
bit uncouth for someone "retired early" to use, don't you think, who wants his opinions taken seriously?
Don't judge a book by its........ and all that. Try not being so prejudice, you might like it.
Last edited:
I don't mind Mcdonnell but Corbyn is just a walking failure. He says nothing and does nothing. He's like a socialist lite version of Major. At least Major bent Currie over...Yuck I'm going to stop there.
When he came in I thought a new broom genuine fresh change but he is ideology comes first. Above party, above country.
I want to like him I really do. I'm left wing and very anti Tory but this clown couldn't organise a demo in a brewery full of coal miners.
You can't seriously believe that.
I started off yesterday by posting situation that I have come across concerning the free movement of labour and how it can be an advantage to people like me who employ tradesmen, but a disadvantage to UK based tradesmen. I stated that I employ citizens who come here looking for work from other EU countries. I stressed numerous times that the people I employ are registered traders, that they are not paid cash in hand or recruited down the pub. They come to me via a tendering process, they invoice for their work and they are paid into a bank account.
Despite the above, between you and Jonathan Agnew you managed to suggest that I was exploiting vulnerable people, reckless as to whether I was using slave labour, swindling the tax payers, that I hated Polish citizens and was somehow involved in an unsavoury world of business.
You really need to look at yourself before you talk about pragmatism, professionalism and being taken seriously. The disjointed leaps to random assumptions based on absolutely no evidence that you make, leaves me wondering if you are a stable person.
I was think that myself. if they are all pulling in different directions, they may unwittingly take us in the direction we need to be going.
Could that be because there are no coal miners left to fill a brewery?[/QUOTE]
I was trying to make a funny to cheer you up. Specifically you wheeler.
I failed. I'm sorry.
Not at all, With JC in charge they all be united in a chorus of
"Oh, Jeremy Corbyn"
It'd be just like Glastonbury again.
.
Leopards don't change their spots, it's for electoral purposes.
.
D
Deleted member 128
Guest
Likewise, I think he has some issues with either his emotions and/or his understanding of English.
Fly em around ports and airports that will stop us leaving this Island! Yes as for 24/7 operation - even military drones are hampered by wind and rain.
but everyone DO keep on talking about him. there has been moments it began to feel like a support group for the bereaved.
its called irony, you wouldn't get it, it requires self-reflexivity, something leave voters are not exactly renowned for.
You both surprise me, try adding "If".
If we flew drones around the areas where there's illegal immigration attempts, after the example of the Gatwick episode we'd also be grounding our airliners, stopping us leaving.
An amusing ironical comment on how we often defeat ourselves.
.
irony is unfortunately not something one shroud try to explain. if i said anything along the lines of "were on a thread discussing 'not leaving' or 'leaving' the eu; and trapped on an insignificant little island where the act of 'leaving' or 'not leaving' our biggst and best neighbour has somehow completely occupied our consciousness. and that drones stopping us from leaving represent a comical analogy for this spurious dilemma, my old English teacher would give me one mark. but i fear i have completely ruined it for anyone who enjoys it as a metaphor. i think i detect a theme here, but feel free to say if its of the mark: it is unfortunate that you and tom had an altercation in which he called you an idiot. that, however, is an entirely different matter from the likes of 50herz deliberately being obtuse and pretending not to understand as part of a well rehearsed little trolling exercise.