I cannot imagine any kind of deal that will prevail in parliamentary debate or as a subject matter for a referendum.I reckon she'll get a deal at the 11th hour.
Tom
I cannot imagine any kind of deal that will prevail in parliamentary debate or as a subject matter for a referendum.I reckon she'll get a deal at the 11th hour.
any deal that gives parliament 2 year transition will probably be OK, membership fees are worth £22 billions out of the £39. If we leave without a deal, we'll be sued for the whole £39 billions.I cannot imagine any kind of deal that will prevail in parliamentary debate or as a subject matter for a referendum.
Tom
Just think 28 countries and only the poor old UK lost their sovereignty joining the EU! How did that happen I wonder? Must be something in the water...Tonight of BBC Radio there's a program titled "In Search of Sovereignty", presented by American satirist Joe Queenan. Should be fun!
It's on Radio 4 at 8pm and repeated on Wednesday at 11am. Alternatively one can listen at any time after tonight's broadcast on the BBC i-player on this link
.
"If this is done badly, it could hurt the whole bloomin' country worse than any previous action ever taken by the UK government."This is interesting
One thing is clear for me, a compulsive label reader when it comes to food, no more UK food stuff in my home after brexit, I will no longer have the quality guarantees and EU consumer protection.When you think about it, British folk aren't keen to take on the roles of fruit pickers, is it any wonder that Vets who enjoy status, and high wages want to demean themselves to do the vital but dirty and soul destroying work in abbatoirs that the EU vets are presently doing?
Without them our whole Meat production industry for Export ceases to exist, and domestic meat consumption will become a health risk.
Oh the Goodness is flowing alright!
For me, the IEA is one of a large number of quango-like bodies that serves no useful purpose for the people of the UK, its primary function being to employ tories who are too ugly to be selected as MPs.IEA got a bit of a questioning on newsnight last night.
You would be have to be blind not to observe dear old Vladimir's hand in this!in this day and age, you can see foreign influence anywhere and everywhere, so don't be surprised that the same accusations are applicable also to the opposite camp.
One thing though, funders of the brexit camp tend to be financiers. They have the most to gain with deregulation of financial services after brexit for they make money out of chaos and the EU introduces gradually legislation to curb micro/computerised share trading, tax havens, sweet heart CT deals for multi-nationals, money laundering etc. They would accept easily that we leave the EU while keeping regulatory alignment on goods. That's what the Chequers deal is.
Someone help me with this , I'm struggling with the concept that by implication the Tory party selects its MP's from "The pretty ones"For me, the IEA is one of a large number of quango-like bodies that serves no useful purpose for the people of the UK, its primary function being to employ tories who are too ugly to be selected as MPs.
Frankly, I believe it should be classified as a proscribed organisation.
Tom
"financiers"? is that the 21st century version of "Rievers"in this day and age, you can see foreign influence anywhere and everywhere, so don't be surprised that the same accusations are applicable also to the opposite camp.
One thing though, funders of the brexit camp tend to be financiers. They have the most to gain with deregulation of financial services after brexit for they make money out of chaos and the EU introduces gradually legislation to curb micro/computerised share trading, tax havens, sweet heart CT deals for multi-nationals, money laundering etc. They would accept easily that we leave the EU while keeping regulatory alignment on goods. That's what the Chequers deal is.