Brexit, for once some facts.

That I suggest is wishful thinking on your (and my ) behalf. if that had been a strategy, they would not have triggered article 50 so early or would have pleaded an in ability to negotiate due to changed conditions (the election) at home.
I agree, but I'm not sure its what they are planning, but I do think its what might happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

oldtom

Esteemed Pedelecer
I note that we still have contributors who have never taken the time to learn and understand the make-up and functions of the various elements of the EU. The nonsense about unelected, faceless decision-makers in Brussels has been debunked in this thread a long time ago but some vocal 'Brexidiots' are still posting absolute rubbish about the EU.

It is all readily available via any internet search engine and if anyone takes a little time to go through just some of the material, it will quickly become evident that the transparency, honesty and democratic processes which underpin all the functions and processes of EU business shame our British parliamentary system.

This short clip of the final part of an interview with Bertrand Russell from many years ago is something that all those anti-EU, anti-foreigner 'Brexit' devotees would do well to listen to and understand .


Tom​
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
We are all discussing Brexit as though the EU have any negotiating room to accommodate May's wishlist. But the Slovenian PM pointed out that the EU have already been briefed by Barnier as to what the UK will be allowed....it is impractical for Barnier to refer to all 27 countries so the EU position is set in stone. The Slovenian PM disagrees with every aspect of the U.K. position,he is one of many who would veto any attempt by Barnier to change the EU's pre agreed terms.
He specifically mentioned that a hard border between N.I. and Ireland is essential to avoid back door smuggling. He also said that the EU and UK are so far apart that he couldn't see any possibility of a deal.
I suspect that Slovenia does almost no trade with the U.K. so any veto on his part and others like him will have no effect on his country.
The point I am making is that David is wasting his time....The EU have their red lines and we(Theresa May) have our red lines,these are completely opposite.....we might as well bring back to the UK what the EU are offering and vote on it.
KudosDave
. No not true, Barnier does have a negotiating space. The plan is that following the negotiations, Barnier generates a conclusion document which is then voted on by qualified majority voting at the EU parliment.. so even were Ireland or Slovakia utterly opposed, it could still pass and become the EU position.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
The UK's biggest problem in stupidly attempting to negotiate all the trade and significant other benefits we enjoy as part of the EU is that we have no-one in government sufficiently talented to persuade the EU negotiators towards allowing us to have all those things....for free!

With an intellectual desert as a leader, the UK is simply going to fail and we will find ourselves out in the cold, desperately trying to do back-door deals with some seedy second-division players on the world stage.

View attachment 20900

Tom
.. talent or lack of it would be irrelevant. It is impossible to square a circle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
Oxygen James....what electric bike do you ride?
KudosDave
Hi Dave.

When I first joined eons ago I had just bought an Oxygen - hence the name - but I then later got rid of that and got a something else who's name escapes me - and now I have a Haibike. Which is super excellent if a little ridiculously expensive.

I do hope you're not going to use that information to argue against Brexit - though I fear you might.... but heck I have nothing to do right now so fire away.

James.
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
For all you Brexit lovers out there Matt Ridley has written an excellent piece today in the Times. Here's the first two paragraphs and the link. I know you all want to broaden your minds and read other opinions.

"Why does the European Union raise a tariff on coffee? It has no coffee industry to protect so the sole effect is to make coffee more expensive for all Europeans. Even where there is an industry to protect, protectionism hurts far more people than it helps. Last October the EU surreptitiously quintupled the tariff on imported oranges to 16 per cent to protect Spanish citrus producers against competition from South Africa and punish the rest of us. It imposes a tax of 4.7 per cent on imported umbrellas, 15 per cent on unicycles and 16.9 per cent on sports footwear.

I find that many Twitter trolls do not even realise that the European “single market” is actually a fortress protected by high external tariff walls. Yet external tariffs are pure self-harm; they are blockades against your own ports, as the economist Ryan Bourne has pointed out. We impose sanctions on pariah regimes, restricting their imports, not to help their economies but to hurt them. The entire point of producing things is to consume things (the pattern of pay shows that we work to live rather than vice versa), so punishing consumers is perverse. As Adam Smith put it, describing the European Union in advance, “in the mercantile system the interest of the consumer is almost constantly sacrificed to that of the producer”."

For the full article go to here:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/best-hope-for-free-trade-is-to-have-principles-7wgfw2l7v
 
For all you Brexit lovers out there Matt Ridley has written an excellent piece today in the Times. Here's the first two paragraphs and the link. I know you all want to broaden your minds and read other opinions.

"Why does the European Union raise a tariff on coffee? It has no coffee industry to protect so the sole effect is to make coffee more expensive for all Europeans. Even where there is an industry to protect, protectionism hurts far more people than it helps. Last October the EU surreptitiously quintupled the tariff on imported oranges to 16 per cent to protect Spanish citrus producers against competition from South Africa and punish the rest of us. It imposes a tax of 4.7 per cent on imported umbrellas, 15 per cent on unicycles and 16.9 per cent on sports footwear.

I find that many Twitter trolls do not even realise that the European “single market” is actually a fortress protected by high external tariff walls. Yet external tariffs are pure self-harm; they are blockades against your own ports, as the economist Ryan Bourne has pointed out. We impose sanctions on pariah regimes, restricting their imports, not to help their economies but to hurt them. The entire point of producing things is to consume things (the pattern of pay shows that we work to live rather than vice versa), so punishing consumers is perverse. As Adam Smith put it, describing the European Union in advance, “in the mercantile system the interest of the consumer is almost constantly sacrificed to that of the producer”."

For the full article go to here:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/best-hope-for-free-trade-is-to-have-principles-7wgfw2l7v
All very interesting.... so how do you feel knowing that 44% of our exports go to the EU, benefiting us from being inside that fortress. So we and suddenly we're outside, and competing with the EU. How do you think UK business will cope with that?

We're also going to loose all the free trade access we have to the other nations that our EU membership gets us access to. We'll be on WTO with everyone.
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
What, like you can't directly choose the PM, or the Secretary of State for Health, or Defense, or or or... because they are chosen by the people you elect to take these decisions for you. Same as you elect your MEP to take these decisions for you.

We live in a system of parliamentary democracy, that's in the UK and the EU. In both cases you vote for people and they then go off and make the decisions and vote people into the positions of power.

The EU is not an un democratic organisation, and if you think it is, it is you that is mistaken.

The Commission is chosen by the elected members of the countries in the EU, so again chosen by the people you elected to make decisions for you. Just like the government is chosen by the MP you might have voted for.. the EU commission is chosen by the Government you voted for.

"Under Article 17 of the EU treaty, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, the Commission President is formally proposed by the European Council (the 28 heads of government of the EU member states), by a qualified-majority vote, and is then 'elected' by a majority vote in the European Parliament"
But they're not British. Any way you cut it - you're giving your/our power away to people who are not British. I do not want to be governed by a bunch of Europeans. Plain and simple.
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
so the conservative government has to deliver brexit or loses power.
In a way, doing nothing and just wait for brexit to come may be their best card.
Whichever way they (the tories) move, they are going to make a lot of people very unhappy.
Not if they get rid of the ECJ and stop limitless EU immigration and enable us to get free trade deals they won't - ie if they actually implement Brexit.
 
But they're not British. Any way you cut it - you're giving your/our power away to people who are not British. I do not want to be governed by a bunch of Europeans. Plain and simple.
err... a) we're Europeans. b) you're not giving your power away. You don't understand it, that's clear. But the UK is very much part of the EU its not some foreign body, we're part of it, an integral important part. I think you'd feel different if the EU HQ was based in the UK, or if the current president was British.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
All very interesting.... so how do you feel knowing that 44% of our exports go to the EU, benefiting us from being inside that fortress. So we and suddenly we're outside, and competing with the EU. How do you think UK business will cope with that?

We're also going to loose all the free trade access we have to the other nations that our EU membership gets us access to. We'll be on WTO with everyone.
So? Singapore do pretty well on it. As do Hong Kong. As does New Zealand. Let us compete with the best - businesses that can't compete will fail. Great. Who wins? The consumer. Its called trade.
 

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
You seem to be missing the point, "if passed". That is decided by the European Parliamnt which is elected, the Commissioners, one from each member country, can only propose measures.

But they don't even have that sole right. Many of the measures enacted have been proposed by the European Parliament to the EU Commission for consideration. Once again a democratic sourcing. The European Parliament once even proposed a measure for us to the Commission, that all pedelec power limits be dispensed with and only the assist speed limit controlling. As it happened the Commission rejected that proposal, feeling it went a bit too far for unregistered vehicles.
.
But we can't vote it down. They even changed the voting whenever it was to allow majority passing of laws - to some - how many votes did the UK vote against in the last umpteen years that got passed anyway. We have no power. We had no control. Now we do - or soon will. GOOD NEWS.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
Flecc, now who is being naïve. Unless wealth bought power and health , what value would it have. ?
..
Context. This discussion is about democratic rule, which should not be bought as it's done so disgracefully in the USA.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
So? Singapore do pretty well on it. As do Hong Kong.
they don't have much land, so they concentrate their effort on transformation industries and trade. Both rely heavily on commuter workers going to work by trains and buses - you have to see for yourself the number of people going to work in HK from the new territory or the railways station in Johor Bahru (Malasia side to Singapore) every morning to realize that's not going to work in the UK. It's like Gibralta multiplied 100 folds.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: flecc

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
But we can't vote it down. They even changed the voting whenever it was to allow majority passing of laws - to some - how many votes did the UK vote against in the last umpteen years that got passed anyway. We have no power. We had no control. Now we do - or soon will. GOOD NEWS.

Of course we were voted down, our mission being to disrupt and refuse co-operation in the European project. If we'd been full members not demanding special treatments and working in co-operation, I've no doubt our input would have had a far better reception.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

OxygenJames

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jan 8, 2012
2,593
1,041
Sorry Woosh, but that is a fools pardon. He is entitled to an opinion, but he or she is equally required to ensure that it is a informed opinion.. we have been over this ground before. None of us, over the age of reason, is entitled to spout nonsense or lies .. only in the USA with its absurd constitutional amendment is that permissable.
On reflection, I am surmising that it is the UKs inexperience with collations or consensus politics, that reflects it's poor performance at the highest levels in Europe. An ability to negotiate and work with others, would be a requirement and the leaders from smaller countries particularly with pr or etc electro systems are at an advantage.
Our 'poor performance' in the 'highest levels of Europe' is - perhaps - more due to the fact that we WE NEVER WANTED TO BE PART OF A FULLY INTEGRATED Europe in the first place. Doh. Which is where it's going (the EU). We do not want that. Try to get that in your head. You say you're not from the UK yes? (apologies if not but I think I remember you saying that). It is showing. Just because you're hanging out here with a bunch of people who would in fact like us to be part of the federal states of Europe - does not mean thats true of most people here. Against all odds we won the referendum. This has been a long time coming. You are talking to the losing side here. They are not happy. Nor would I have been had we lost. But that's not what happened. We want out. Plain and simple.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: robdon and oldtom

Advertisers