That was exactly what I posted about .and why it was such a wrong statement It was utterly crass on her part.
That was exactly what I posted about .and why it was such a wrong statement It was utterly crass on her part.
Other than Crimea , ..which is or was a spiritual homeland , and is the location of their Navy, and really could and should have been ceded to Russia , I agree with you. How would you feel if the Isle of Wright was handed to the French,along with the Channel Islands? The best outcome from these negotiations would be for Ukraine to formally acknowledge Russian ownership of Crimea, but argue regarding Donbass.All probably true but probably not. (I've included a wiki to explain real reasons Russia can't be in EU or NATO)
Russia–European Union relations - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
But all certainly utterly irrelevant to situation we now find ourselves in. That is a belligerent dictator with a pack of lies for justification chooses to force his own Citizens with fear and lies, to invade an adjacent peaceful, democrat country and in so doing kills thousands, yet when the rest of decent humanity protest he threatens them with nuclear war. You claim he is justified in wanting a corridor to a land he previously invaded. That is insane flecc. Putin has no right to be in either Crimea or Ukraine. He had no right to send agents with novichok to uk, he had no right to poison people who speak against him. He has no right to invade anybody. Neither he or the party he in theory represents were elected. He bullied his way to power and voted himself as leader beyond 2024. Hardly EU worthy is it Flecc, unless your idea of EU has deteriorated somewhat.
And by the way Flecc, if VDL etc etc does decide to allow Ukraine into EU under emergency rules (agreed doubtful) by default EU is at war immediately with Russia.
Putin and Putin alone has caused this ridiculous affair, and as I said lots of posts ago, a comment you ridiculed, he really has gone too far this time. It's going to last years or cause ww3. Unless he backs down, which I doubt somehow.
In last 4 days or so roughly 6000 people have died. How many more before Russia comes to its senses.
I do not lie in this forum and all those are facts verifiable from Western sources. You do not even begin to know this subject yet feel you can insult me by inferring I'm posting lies. Hadn't you noticed that Woosh, almost the only other impartial member posted a Like to the post you are commenting on?All probably true but probably not.
All since the facts I posted so irrelevant. Of course Russia can't join the EU now but could have done some 20 years ago as they adopted the very different course that the USA blocked. They could never have joined NATO since it was founded as a specifically anti Russian organisation.Russia–European Union relations - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
For the umpteenth time stop lying about what I post. I have never said he was justified. Saying he was driven into what he has done is not me saying he was justified, it's just comment, not approval.You claim he is justified in wanting a corridor to a land he previously invaded.
Broadly agreed, but why argue about Donbass? An old Russian population region with long outdated and broken down industrial infrastructure. Even the Russians didn't want it until they realised it might become useful in protecting their southern fleet. I doubt they'd want it so much if Crimea was recognised by Ukraine and internationally as Russian territory.Other than Crimea , ..which is or was a spiritual homeland , and is the location of their Navy, and really could and should have been ceded to Russia , I agree with you. The best outcome from these negotiations would be for Ukraine to formally acknowledge Russian ownership of Crimea, but argue regarding Donbass.
Oh, he was driven to it.. Sort of justifies most abuse. No he was not driven to anything.I do not lie in this forum and all those are facts verifiable from Western sources. You do not even begin to know this subject yet feel you can insult me by inferring I'm posting lies. Hadn't you noticed that Woosh, almost the only other impartial member posted a Like to the post you are commenting on?
All since the facts I posted so irrelevant. Of course Russia can't join the EU now but could have done some 20 years ago as they adopted the very different course that the USA blocked. They could never have joined NATO since it was founded as a specifically anti Russian organisation.
For the umpteenth time stop lying about what I post. I have never said he was justified. Saying he was driven into what he has done is not me saying he was justified, it's just comment, not approval.
.
Danidl, Woosh and I fully understand this subject so we post impartially.Oh, he was driven to it.. Sort of justifies most abuse. No he was not driven to anything.
He chose to do the things he has done, you just seem to buy his lies and rhetoric justifying it in his mind. OK, perhaps not yours.
I, m not sure why world stood by and accepted Putin just marching into Crimean. Even Danidl seems to make a distinction between it and Ukraine. No, they are one of the same. It was part of a democratic country. Ukraine. What is wrong with you flecc. Invading Crimean, Ukraine or anywhere is simply wrong. Its bullying.
As Danidl said and as I asked, what if Putin chose France, Italy or Ireland. There is no difference.
You still haven't answered the question flecc. Had Putin chose Italy over Ukraine how would you think? He was driven to it perhaps?
View attachment 45909
Woosh and yourself speak about these regions as though they are places on some board game. Risk perhaps. Putin does same.
They are not. They are peoples homes, lives and lively hoods. Kids quivering in basements tonight in Ukraine because Putin was driven to it and needs a corridor to his Black Sea Fleet. Utter bo!! ox.
He is a megalomaniac killing innocent people.
Your posts prove you assume a knowledge and understanding you do not possess.Danidl, Woosh and I fully understand this subject so we post impartially.
You very clearly have little understanding of it so post emotionally on what you see at the moment.
We don't need you to tell us that what is going on is appalling, any fool can see that. But it takes knowledge to understand why it has happened and know all those responsible.
.
Quite the opposite as you show with your link.Your posts prove you assume a knowledge and understanding you do not possess.
Russia-Ukraine war: What is Putin’s endgame?
The Russian president is facing an unexpected level of resistance, but is determined to continue on a belligerent path.www.aljazeera.com
In a statement, the Swiss government said it will implement the sanctions in coordination with the EU, adding that these were “primarily goods and financial sanctions”.This is a big step for Switzerland.
Indeed that is surprising. However there may be an element of currying favour since the Swiss have some serious problems with their EU relationship and want more favourable treatment.Was surprised to see this:
Switzerland, a favourite destination for Russian oligarchs, has set aside its tradition of neutrality and announced that it will adopt all the sanctions already imposed by the European Union on Russia.
There are quite a few precedents.Was surprised to see this:
Switzerland, a favourite destination for Russian oligarchs, has set aside its tradition of neutrality and announced that it will adopt all the sanctions already imposed by the European Union on Russia.
Following a government meeting on Monday, Switzerland’s president Ignazio Cassis said that the country would immediately freeze the assets of Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, prime minister Mikhail Mishustin and foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, as well as all 367 individuals sanctioned last week by the EU.
Cassis told reporters today:
In a statement, the Swiss government said it will implement the sanctions in coordination with the EU, adding that these were “primarily goods and financial sanctions”.
In so doing, Switzerland is responding to the serious violations of international law for which these individuals are responsible
May be not completely gone yet, but Putin seems to have started his military enterprise without anticipating that so many countries will be sending money and weapons to support the Ukrainians.The days of powerful countries being able to colonise weaker one's are long gone, well they should be.
why argue about Donbass..?. I know little about it, so I am unwilling to comment. But the huge point is that partition is rarely a solution, and Crimea is a self limiting peninsula, whereas the Donbass is potentially open endedBroadly agreed, but why argue about Donbass? An old Russian population region with long outdated and broken down industrial infrastructure. Even the Russians didn't want it until they realised it might become useful in protecting their southern fleet. I doubt they'd want it so much if Crimea was recognised by Ukraine and internationally as Russian territory.
.
Flecc, its irrelevant when a country was formed. What happened 30 years or 100 years ago has nothing to do with it. Ukraine is an Independant sovereign country with a legitimate democracy. Part of that country was the Crimean Peninsula. (upto 2014,after which its rather disputed, but UN still see Crimea as Ukrainian territory)Quite the opposite as you show with your link.
That is the result, not the cause, of the history you do not know. The history is not an excuse but it is the reason for the events, showing how the events need never have happened.
You lack of knowledge leads you into mistakes, such as being critical of Danidl's post and saying the Crimea is Ukraine. It was never Ukraine and wasn't occupied by Ukrainians, it was traditionally the home of the Russian Tartars, an Islamic people. It ended up very empty when the Tartars left and was mainly a Russian base then. As Danidl posted it should have been ceded to Russia, but as ever when countries are artificially created as the Ukraine has been, such mistakes are made.
Countries are only stable when they grow naturally over time. That's why we saw the mess in the Middle East, the Balkans, East Germany and Northern Ireland and others, all due to countries being created artificially and too quickly.
That is also Ukraines problem, created as a country only just over a century ago and gradually added to since with areas from other countries following each world war and the years following, including from Russia and Poland. Hence their long standing internal strife.
We can only learn from history if we know it. Not knowing it or saying it isn't relevant is why the same mistakes keep getting made.
.
Agreed, I almost said as much. Putin thinks differently.May be not completely gone yet, but Putin seems to have started his military enterprise without anticipating that so many countries will be sending money and weapons to support the Ukrainians.
Finland has just said they will too.
I wonder if the USA would start sending in their drones.
Ukraine can't match the fire power of Putin's army, regardless of the amount of weapons they may be supplied with. They can only negotiate a voluntary Russian withdrawal or suffer the destruction of the kind of Beirut.If Ukraine has half the stuff folk have supposed to have sent and can use it, think balance of power is firmly on defenders side.
Agreed in broad terms, it depends how desperate and what Putin will target. They have taken thermo baric weapons but as yet haven't used them.Ukraine can't match the fire power of Putin's army, regardless of the amount of weapons they may be supplied with. They can only negotiate a voluntary Russian withdrawal or suffer the destruction of the kind of Beirut.