I got one with wheels....I rest my case.
I got one with wheels....I rest my case.
I only had the one to rest, you're obviously a professionalI got one with wheels.
and im still not dead but you can get the jacket here....I rest my case.
I hope they're folded over and pounded more than 200 times by Japanese artisan packersand im still not dead but you can get the jacket here.
or here but different mask
Mens Goggle Jacket - Lightweight Black KillJoy Jacket
Mens Goggle Jacket. Our Black Killjoy Jacket in a lightweight windrunner style, sturdy zipper, 4 outer zipped pockets & 1 inner pocket - Buy Nowwww.locationclothing.com
Wrong. The efficacy of a vaccine in preventing an infection is precisely the measure of a vaccine's worth. That is why it is expressed in percentage terms and those that fail to reach above 60% are regarded as failures.The function of a vaccine is to generate antibodies in advance of a disease . The fundamental point is that the vaccine does not in itself treat .it . They prime the immune system ,which then does the business. It is great if they succeed in stopping the infection at the front door, but that is not a measure of their efficacy.
This and the above are precisely what I posted on March 8th in opening this discussion.The vaccines are definitely not antigens. What they do is instruct the cells to manufacture antigens.
It's here.Omicron is the new official name for the "Botswana" variant.
Belgian officials have confirmed it has already been detected there. Should be with us by tomorrow afternoon's Eurostar.
.
I'm quoting flecc, but this goes out to any knowledgeable person here.... The efficacy of a vaccine in preventing an infection is precisely the measure of a vaccine's worth. That is why it is expressed in percentage terms and those that fail to reach above 60% are regarded as failures...
Many vaccines do not provide immunity, at least, not in all subjects. But many do impact on the severity should the subject catch that dose. For example:Wrong. The efficacy of a vaccine in preventing an infection is precisely the measure of a vaccine's worth. That is why it is expressed in percentage terms and those that fail to reach above 60% are regarded as failures.
This and the above are precisely what I posted on March 8th in opening this discussion.
In common with a number of others approving that post, you appended a "Like" to it.
That is a measure of how much you've allowed yourself to be influenced and your mind changed by the propaganda since.
I've termed your verbose responses since as ducking and diving, going to any lengths to try to convince the truth has changed.
It hasn't, and I hope members will not be fooled by all the blather and blarney.
OED definitions:
Vaccine: A preparation injected or administered orally to give immunity against an infection.
Antigen: A substance that causes the body to produce antibodies.
The Covid vaccines fail to meet the first definition. They do precisely meet the second one. Therefore they are antigens.
QED.
.
Agreed, but they do primarily act as vaccines.Many vaccines do not provide immunity, at least, not in all subjects.
95% effective means most of your body won't be affected by Covid but 5% will..so perhaps your feet will feel like they have flu or worse for a week or 2..I'm quoting flecc, but this goes out to any knowledgeable person here.
How exactly do they calculate the quoted efficacy/effectiveness percentage?
When they come out and say something like "the Moderna vaccine is 95% effective", what exactly does that mean ??
I have no idea of the new speak definition, but it appears to be the peak point of protection against acquiring the disease, certainly not a lasting one.I'm quoting flecc, but this goes out to any knowledgeable person here.
How exactly do they calculate the quoted efficacy/effectiveness percentage?
When they come out and say something like "the Moderna vaccine is 95% effective", what exactly does that mean ??
"In immunology, an antigen is a molecule or molecular structure that can bind to a specific antibody or T-cell receptor. The presence of antigens in the body may trigger an immune response. The term antigen originally referred to a substance that is an antibody generator.".... WikipediaWrong. The efficacy of a vaccine in preventing an infection is precisely the measure of a vaccine's worth. That is why it is expressed in percentage terms and those that fail to reach above 60% are regarded as failures.
This and the above are precisely what I posted on March 8th in opening this discussion.
In common with a number of others approving that post, you appended a "Like" to it.
That is a measure of how much you've allowed yourself to be influenced and your mind changed by the propaganda since.
I've termed your verbose responses since as ducking and diving, going to any lengths to try to convince the truth has changed.
It hasn't, and I hope members will not be fooled by all the blather and blarney.
OED definitions:
Vaccine: A preparation injected or administered orally to give immunity against an infection.
Antigen: A substance that causes the body to produce antibodies.
The Covid vaccines fail to meet the first definition. They do precisely meet the second one. Therefore they are antigens.
QED.
.
Indeed originally, just before Covid and the vaccine new speak."In immunology, an antigen is a molecule or molecular structure that can bind to a specific antibody or T-cell receptor. The presence of antigens in the body may trigger an immune response. The term antigen originally referred to a substance that is an antibody generator.".... Wikipedia
Note the inclusion of the word originally...
But flecc, that is exactly the same with any of the other vaccines as well. No vaccine guarantees immunity, they all have limitations.Agreed, but they do primarily act as vaccines.
The Covid vaccines don't guarantee immunity in anyone. Furthermore, a vaccinated person who catches Covid is as effective in transmitting the disease as anyone unvaccinated.
Impacting on the severity is the primary benefit of the Covid vaccines, just read the posts of my opposers in here to see that.
As I have clearly shown, the Covid vaccines are antigens rather than vaccines.
.
Those tents are useless and do nothing to contain the smell, which you probably can't smell yourself anymore but are in fact so pungent it stinks to high heaven and is what alerts the cops to where its coming from.
Think my definition is easier to understand... And it's of similar value for arguing about Covid. We are all saying just have the vaccine/antigen. It might save your life, it might keep you out of hospital and it will reduce stress on NHS. That's justification.But flecc, that is exactly the same with any of the other vaccines as well. No vaccine guarantees immunity, they all have limitations.
CDC website...
The MMR is 97% effective against contracting Rubella
MMR vaccine is very safe and effective. The mumps component of the MMR vaccine is about 88% (range: 32-95%) effective when a person gets two doses; one dose is about 78% (range: 49%−92%) effective.
Other review...
"Measles: one dose of vaccine was 95% effective in preventing measles. Based on the data analysed in the review, the number of cases would fall from 7% in unvaccinated children to under 0.5% in children who receive one dose of the vaccine. After two doses, effectiveness was similar at around 96%.
Mumps: one dose of vaccine was 72% effective in preventing mumps. This rose to 86% after two doses. From data analysed in the review. the number of cases would fall from 7.4% in unvaccinated children to 1% in children were vaccinated with two doses. "
i had a massive carbon filter in the loft with a giant in line fan the tent would suck in when it was zipped up lol you could not smell anything.Those tents are useless and do nothing to contain the smell, which you probably can't smell yourself anymore but are in fact so pungent it stinks to high heaven and is what alerts the cops to where its coming from.
I have seen grow containers, based on something akin to a fridge that seals up completely, vented through a huge carbon filter. It might save you in the future from getting your door panned in an a hefty fine.
I'm not anti weed, I used to polish off about 1 1/2oz a month till i realized how much that was costing financially and how much of a laziness impact it was making in my life. Now I don't mind the occasional gram at Xmas, which lasts well over a weekend, but smoking so much of it that you need to produce crops of the stuff is a bad position to be in.
No matter how you care to justify it
During my work in education (I never claim to be a teacher, learning has to take place for that to be case, I was firefighting) we had to have close links with our local pschyciatric ward. (amongst many other institutions in our multi disciplinary approach). Always shocked me how many youths and kids were under their care because of cannabis. Anybody thinking cannabis is harmless really should take a trip to their local ward and ask what medical profession think about its unregulated use amongst kids/youths. Yep, it might not cause psychosis but it certainly brings it about if folk have tendencies that way.Those tents are useless and do nothing to contain the smell, which you probably can't smell yourself anymore but are in fact so pungent it stinks to high heaven and is what alerts the cops to where its coming from.
I have seen grow containers, based on something akin to a fridge that seals up completely, vented through a huge carbon filter. It might save you in the future from getting your door panned in an a hefty fine.
I'm not anti weed, I used to polish off about 1 1/2oz a month till i realized how much that was costing financially and how much of a laziness impact it was making in my life. Now I don't mind the occasional gram at Xmas, which lasts well over a weekend, but smoking so much of it that you need to produce crops of the stuff is a bad position to be in.
No matter how you care to justify it