All part of unnecessary global waste. Fighting gravity by using energy is stupid.he spends his money developing rocket engines, re-useable booster rockets, vertical take off and landing. They are part of global research effort.
.
All part of unnecessary global waste. Fighting gravity by using energy is stupid.he spends his money developing rocket engines, re-useable booster rockets, vertical take off and landing. They are part of global research effort.
I suppose in the future, it will be magnetic reconnection instead of burning hydrogen.All part of unnecessary global waste. Fighting gravity by using energy is stupid.
.
Even though you have 15 years on me, my childhood experience was no different... . Last year with Covid , I decided to grow my own lettuces in plastic buckets .. had i realised just how easy it was, I should have done it a decade earlier. However the Rocket has gone feral and its growing in every nook and cranny... including the gutters..Such things are easily said but can't be done, thanks to the traps we've built for ourselves.
To illustrate:
As a kid at the start of the 1940s, for my mother I'd nip over the road to Mr Grice at the corner shop. No chance of getting run over, traffic didn't exist, just a very rare motor vehicle so they weren't an atmospheric pollution issue either.
I'd ask for cheese, which meant cheddar, the only one, which Mr Grice had in a huge block, and he'd cut off what I indicated with a cutting wire and hand it to me in a piece of greaseproof paper. Bacon sliced on the spot and handed over in a scrap of greaseproof paper got the same treatment. Ditto luncheon meat or corned beef. If I wanted biscuits there were two or three types in one foot cube tins full of loose biscuits, so I'd take a brown paper bag, rummage for how many I wanted to pop into the bag. Potato Crisps were only one type, plain potato with a blue paper wrap of salt in each packet to add if one wished, and those packets also came in the one foot cubed tins. If a shopping bag was needed we took our own fabric shopping bag.
The vans that delivered the tins of biscuits and crisps would pick up the empty tins and throw them onto the van roof which had a retaining rail around the top, so they'd go back for refilling. The brown paper bags we'd carefully fold and reuse for various purposes, often several times over. Everything else was minimal so recycling was scarcely necessary.
Now try to translate all of that into supermarkets, often many miles away and even out of town. All that exposed cheese and meat handed over loose, everyone picking loose biscuits etc out of large tins with their bare hands, nothing back then needing plastic, which other than bakelite hadn't even been invented.
.
We've made a massive rod for our own backs and to get back to where we were is probably nearly impossible with the 40% growth in the population since then.
We'd need to rebuild or reverse engineer almost everything we have, including our lives.
.
It is very exciting though. The site of a Saturn V belching fire, noise and smoke is wonderful. I’d be disappointed if we never had any prospect of seeing a machine like that again.All part of unnecessary global waste. Fighting gravity by using energy is stupid.
.
Yes, fighting gravity is very exciting. But if we continue to do it, wrecking the planet, the outcome will be the same as if we all fight it by jumping off very tall buildings.It is very exciting though.
Believe it or not but Scientific American did that calculation in 2008... To link in with Star Wars Movies. They made the conclusion that unless the acceleration was under 3G or 30 metres per sec 2 , that the person would sufficate. . .9 G is what astronauts and fighter pilots can survive for seconds... . It is surprising how fast 3 G sustained for a month provides in metres per second....Sail Yachts burn very little fuel. Hulls extremely efficient and tiny axillary motors and should only be used in and out harbours etc.. but yes agreed.. We all need to change.
As for hypersonic... For actual space travel it hardly affects it. Twice as fast as now is still insignificant. When humanity invents a way of escaping gravity and doing so in a vehicle capable of at least 0.2C...then space exploration might be worth having another look. As it is. Forget it. Its like exploring Africa on foot,with a bad leg. Actually its far worse. We don't need to send numpties like Captain Kirk to explore... We have telescopes.
And since its pretty much accepted we can't get to anything like 0.2C.(human beings could not stand required acceleration to get to 0.2c in time available) and that even if we could... Thars still 25 years to nearest star... (probably nearer 50 accounting for time required for acceleration phase with a human aboard) but I haven't done calcs. There is no point. We ain't going anywhere. Just entertaining Bozo's limping 20 yards or so into Africa.
Bezos wants to go to moon. Sums it up. He, s a pillock. How much damage to Earth does that little desire cost? Utterly pointless.
.The site of a Saturn V belching fire, noise and smoke is wonderful. I’d be disappointed if we never had any prospect of seeing a machine like that again.
That's ignoring Einstens thoughts (relativistic) on it.. As body accelerates it requires ever more energy to accelerate more.. Its argued (with formula to prove?) to achieve C we would need more energy than available from our planet.Believe it or not but Scientific American did that calculation in 2008... To link in with Star Wars Movies. They made the conclusion that unless the acceleration was under 3G or 30 metres per sec 2 , that the person would sufficate. . .9 G is what astronauts and fighter pilots can survive for seconds... . It is surprising how fast 3 G sustained for a month provides in metres per second....
However I think they are wrong, and if the person were incubated and their lungs and other cavities filled with liquid , and a mechanical pump for oxygenation , they could survive maybe the 10G indefinitely...
And assuming we can find a, propulsion system capable of getting to a significant speed... (ie 0.2c or so?) As yet we are absolutely nowhere near that.Believe it or not but Scientific American did that calculation in 2008... To link in with Star Wars Movies. They made the conclusion that unless the acceleration was under 3G or 30 metres per sec 2 , that the person would sufficate. . .9 G is what astronauts and fighter pilots can survive for seconds... . It is surprising how fast 3 G sustained for a month provides in metres per second....
However I think they are wrong, and if the person were incubated and their lungs and other cavities filled with liquid , and a mechanical pump for oxygenation , they could survive maybe the 10G indefinitely...
who?Another four fuel suppliers gone bust. Small ones: Zebra Power, Omni Energy, AmpowerUK and MA Energy.
Zebra Power, Omni Energy, AmpowerUK and MA Energy.who?
Not at all... Relativistic effects are minor below 1/2 c . . . look I fully agree with Woosh. and to a certain extent with you.... the is little benefit in sending men up , but there is a benefit in sending machines and instruments. The antics of Virgin, and the other characters is not even science... even if there are some engineering benefits.That's ignoring Einstens thoughts (relativistic) on it.. As body accelerates it requires ever more energy to accelerate more.. Its argued (with formula to prove?) to achieve C we would need more energy than available from our planet.
We aren't going anywhere, we haven't even scratched surface with regards space travel yet the bit we, ve scratched has been at simply colusal cost, both environmentally and financially. Time to be realistic and stop pretending we can transit from our planet. We can't and probably never will be able to.
Bozo sent Captain Kirk barely out the atmosphere. Not even a billionth of any worthwhile journey. Utterly ridiculous.
That resembles the toilet paper supply arrangements at my school.At school in the primary levels we began with slates, and after a couple of years we didn't have exercise books, but were issued with a single sheet of paper per lesson, "use both sides" and if the essay was too long, you needed to ask permission for a second sheet.
Have you not heard of Sir Richard Beard? What about Jeff Amazon? Both are spacemen (so I’ve read in the Daily Mail)People who say we shouldn't stop space exploration are mistaken. We haven't actually started it yet. Just dreaming.
Viewing those Bozos as space exolorers is akin to calling a slug circling a stone on an African beach an explorer.It probably thinks it is aswell.... But it ain't.Have you not heard of Sir Richard Beard? What about Jeff Amazon? Both are spacemen (so I’ve read in the Daily Mail)
Moving electrons and moving humans are a bit different Danidl. Go sit in the Cyclotron and see how fast you get upto..Not at all... Relativistic effects are minor below 1/2 c . . . look I fully agree with Woosh. and to a certain extent with you.... the is little benefit in sending men up , but there is a benefit in sending machines and instruments. The antics of Virgin, and the other characters is not even science... even if there are some engineering benefits.
If at some time in the future we do so, it will probably be in a hollowed out lump of Mars fashioned into a hollow ball and with fusion reactors and multi generational families on an odyssey to the local clusters.
But just to be utterly pedantic ... making particles travel at the speed of light, does not require more power than the earth provides, ... my 5 watt Halfords bike lamp manages that fine , and back in the day, the old TV got the electrons in the tube running at about 0.9c
That’s nothing. When I climb onto my shed roof and throw my kettle off it, the kettle accelerates towards the ground at 1G. When I’ve worked out how to make it accelerate at 1G in the opposite direction, my kettle will reach the speed of light in around 12 months and will have traveled 0.5 light years. So shove your Halfords light and your CRTs. I’m onto something here.But just to be utterly pedantic ... making particles travel at the speed of light, does not require more power than the earth provides, ... my 5 watt Halfords bike lamp manages that fine , and back in the day, the old TV got the electrons in the tube running at about 0.9c