Thing about being in denial is that one HAVE to get everyone to agree with one. Somerset maughn's priest ranting about prostitutes come to mind. It's a good read. You may even find it prophetic. Or not. It requires a sense of irony. And self deprecation. However, good luck to you (and the special citizens of croydon)
Edit - I say that in the spirit of us all being in denial. Theres enough ranting about prostitutes, metaphorically speaking, on this thread alone to create several more somerset maugham collections
Jonathan, you seem to have come late to the party in not having a clue what my posting has been about from the beginning of the pandemic. Far from being in denial I've been the odd one out with many arguing against my stance.
From the beginning I was very critical of the national approach which led to London being so hard hit by Covid at the outset, but I maintained that this would benefit us over time, And it did and still is benefitting us, both in London overall and in the microcosm that South Croydon physically is. I've used the latter with its precise details to illustrate what I mean, but that doesn't mean it's special since other London areas have performed similarly as you've observed.
Consistent with this was my maintaining from early on that the vaccines were very poor as vaccines, barely acceptable as such, being antigens of value but useless in preventing the spread of the disease.
My post from March 8th refers , and that got wide support in here.
Since then two members have begun to swing round to my overall point of view on Covid-19 and now Professor Spiegelhalter has finally agreed that getting infected with Covid-19 is as effective as having the vaccines, all the data showing that to be true. He is after all the government's chief statistician.
I go further. In terms of probabilities I believe that getting infected is likely to be more protective in all respects than the vaccines, though to what degree remains to be seen. Recent indications have been increasingly supportive of that view.
.