No, I work in the nhs with people who are not unbalanced, but directly or indirectly profoundly affected. Outside that microcosm I disagree with your assertion that people are largely not affected. If however one take that as true, it's part of the problem. A newer variant has lots of scope to let RIP exponentially.
I said the range was unbalanced, not the people, and it clearly is due to working in the NHS. As you say, a microcosm.
The majority are definitely largely unaffected, my own case illustrating that very clearly:
For the first two months of the pandemic London was the worst hit with an infection rate at 2.5 times the rest of the country and my Borough of Croydon the worst hit in London. Fortunately that lessened but overall we've been at the high end of the Covid figures throughout.
I've been 84 and 85 witn marked underlying health problems, predominately heart/lung.
I'm a member of a 12 strong committee for the local wildlife reserve. Our youngster is 60 and the two members I work with most are both 87. They unsurprisingly have major health problems, one with only 19% kidney function, currently in hospital with a suspected stroke.
We have an average of some 40 regular volunters for work in the reserve, mostly retired and in their late 50s and 60s. Our Friends organisation membership has well over 200 paying members, who I regularly see in the reserve.
Yet despite living in this notorious Covid hotspot with many of the most vulnerable including myself, none of us have had Covid and I don't know anyone who has.
I'm quite sure my lack of Covid experience is replicated all over this country by the majority, given how much less many areas have suffered than London.
.