Rubbish, see this linkIt isn't meant as a lie. The attachment was from official labour site, which clearly states... "where applicable labour Party members must be in a Union".
How do you think Momentum magically gained over half a million Labour Party members. They sure weren't a sudden gain of half a million new union members. Anyway, why is wanting members of a trade union political party to be trade unionist wrong? No-one has to vote for them.
I repeat. Why is wanting members of a trade union political party to be trade unionists wrong? No-one has to vote for them.Either way, it makes no odds. Labour are controlled by McCluskey. That is wrong.
I have never said anything of the sort. I haven't said it shouldn't change, I've pointed out to you why it cannot change since it is out of their control. They are a trade union party dependent on the trade unions who won't let them change.You agree Labour are in complete disarray yet argue nothing should be changed to cure problems. Find that quite odd.
There's actually nothing wrong with that and nothing wrong about McCluskey's influence. It's a free world for any form of political party, including an alternative labour party. Trouble is that there's no demand for one and not even enough support for the present one.
.
Last edited: