Interestingly in the papers today there was far less coverage in the Sun and Daily Mail, though the Express was "business as usual"
What coverage there was was like this
"
Brexit could take MORE than two years to deliver: Chancellor Philip Hammond widens Cabinet split by warning we WILL need a transitional deal with the EU as he takes a swipe at David Davis
- Hammond takes swipe at Brexit colleagues by saying 'thoughtful politicians' want a transitional deal with the EU
- Interim deal is needed to put 'significant infrastructure' in place to deal with adjustment of Brexit
- Predicts Britain will be faced with a five-fold increase in border checks on goods
- Says 'large numbers of people' will be needed to hire and train new border staff
- Tells MPs transitional deal will be discussed 'early on in negotiations' with the EU
What is different is the tone it was presented in, far less forceful, almost passive even, but way out of touch with the reader comments, who are beginning to see Brexit isn't Brexit after all
More of a gentle lets water the whole thing bit by bit, and give the public time to reach the point that they have forgotten about it and lost interest, by finding something else to divert their attention.
The Paucity of Coverage rather suggests the papers are either coming round to that approach or have been encouraged to comply with it.
Possibly the recent You Gov Poll indicating more than 50% of leavers don't want to lose money is encouraging this view?